Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · New Mexico

Kirtland Helo Mx

Albuquerque, NM · ~110 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kirtland Helo Mx runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade A.

Kirtland Helo Mx: 1.9 TCR = 43% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kirtland Helo Mx safety composite

Kirtland Helo Mx scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Kirtland Helo Mx: 1.1 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 2.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.46× in 2022

Kirtland Helo Mx's TCR rose 1.8 from 1.1 in 2021 to 2.8 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Albuquerque, NM AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.9 · 43% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #6/11
  • PHOTO SFS Denver-283DEN
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~110 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SFS Denver-283DEN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Mexico employers → · Look up another →

Kirtland Helo Mx in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kirtland Helo Mx averages 1.9 TCR (43% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kirtland Helo Mx TCR series: 2021=1.1 · 2022=2.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Kirtland Helo Mx falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Mexico alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 11 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in New Mexico.

Kirtland Helo Mx (110 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Kirtland Helo Mx
Kirtland Helo Mx (110 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Kirtland Helo Mx has more employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2021 1.1 1.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · NM · Albuquerque

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,241 rated employers in New Mexico with headcount on file · 944 employers in Albuquerque, NM · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SFS Denver-283DEN 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SFS Indianapolis-285IND 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Eglin Air Force Base (1515) 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US NV Fallon Pasture Rd (1585) 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Delaware West 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE ClearSky Rehabilitation Hospital of Rio Rancho 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ladera Center 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lakeview Christian Home of the Southwest 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR NM-01 4,429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Presbyterian Hospital 4,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cooper Administrative Center 3,531 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ABQ1 1,917 FTE
NAT-TCR Kost Materials 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Oneida Electrical Contractors, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 10 Strawberry Street 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Iowa DOT - Accounting 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bethel Bakery 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE 9215-RIC 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Waterproofing Company LLC 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Liberty Packaging - Omaha 110 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.