Corporate offices · California

Kisco Senior Living Home Office

Carlsbad, CA · ~79 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kisco Senior Living Home Office runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Corporate offices workplace, earning a grade B.

Kisco Senior Living Home Office: 0.4 TCR = 54% of Corporate offices BLS 0.7 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kisco Senior Living Home Office safety composite

Kisco Senior Living Home Office scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2023

Kisco Senior Living Home Office injury rate improved

Kisco Senior Living Home Office's TCR fell 1.5 from 1.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 551114 · Carlsbad, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.4 · 54% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #33/183
  • PHOTO Upstate Niagara Coop…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Upstate Niagara Cooperative Inc - Corporate Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Kisco Senior Living Home Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kisco Senior Living Home Office averages 0.4 TCR (54% of the Corporate offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kisco Senior Living Home Office TCR series: 2016=1.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0 · BLS 0.7

Where Kisco Senior Living Home Office falls in its industry

1,475 Corporate offices establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 183 Corporate offices employers in California.

Kisco Senior Living Home Office (79 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Kisco Senior Living Home Office
Kisco Senior Living Home Office (79 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Kisco Senior Living Home Office has fewer employees than the Corporate offices median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

551114 · CA · Carlsbad

1,475 Corporate offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 218 employers in Carlsbad, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Upstate Niagara Cooperative Inc - Corporate Office 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR A Good Egg Headquarters 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Veritiv Operating Company - GA504 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Omaha NE (6 Cag Dr) 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crisalida Berry Farms, LLC 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE L E Cooke Co 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOBI'S 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Maricopa 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thermo Fisher Scientific 2,234 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legoland California Resort 2,055 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bergelectric Corp. CA 1,520 FTE
CITY-NEAR Life Sciences Solutions Group (LSG) Remote Employees 1,350 FTE
NAT-TCR Shooter and Lindsey 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Schneider Electric - Fairfield 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Region Complex (Florence) 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sky Unlimited Inc 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE YESCO LLC - Chandler (PHX), AZ Establishment 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Opp 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE C.O. Christian & Sons Co., LLC 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beaumont Health Care Center 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.