Nursing homes · California

Kit Carson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Jackson, CA · ~97 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kit Carson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade D.

Kit Carson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center: 9.2 TCR = 142% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kit Carson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Kit Carson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.1

2017→2024

Kit Carson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center injury rate improved

Kit Carson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's TCR fell 5.1 from 12.2 in 2017 to 7.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 14.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=12.2 · 2018=10.2 · 2019=14.5 · 2021=7.6 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=7.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Jackson, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 9.2 · 142% of ind

  • DART 7.2 DART
  • RANK #450/739
  • PHOTO Medilodge of Holland
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~97 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Medilodge of Holland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Kit Carson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kit Carson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center averages 9.2 TCR (142% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kit Carson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2017=12.2 · 2018=10.2 · 2019=14.5 · 2021=7.6 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=7.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Kit Carson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #450 safest of 739 Nursing homes employers in California.

Kit Carson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (97 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Kit Carson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Kit Carson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (97 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Kit Carson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has fewer employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.2 7.2 4 0 0
2023 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2021 7.6 6.1 5 0 0
2019 14.5 11.6 10 0 0
2018 10.2 8.0 9 0 0
2017 12.2 12.2 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Jackson

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 26 employers in Jackson, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Medilodge of Holland 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Luke's Transitional Care Center 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR McPherson Health and Rehab 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waverly Gardens 9.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Grapeman Farms 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Varsity Packing, Inc 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Westland Floral Company Carpinteria, Inc. 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE LOS ANGELES RESERVOIR 97 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jackson Rancheria Casino Resort 981 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30286) 479 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amador County 469 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Amador Hospital (110-7001) 452 FTE
NAT-TCR The Cliffs at Eagle Rock 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Gates & Sons 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodwill Gandy Retail 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Arlington 9.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE US Gypsum Sigurd 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rockland Place 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE St Louis Sov 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Nsa Ops I 97 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.