Ventilating fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing · North Carolina

Kitchen Ventilation Systems

Kings Mountain, NC · ~82 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kitchen Ventilation Systems runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Ventilating fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Kitchen Ventilation Systems: 2.2 TCR = 66% of Ventilating fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kitchen Ventilation Systems safety composite

Kitchen Ventilation Systems scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2019

Kitchen Ventilation Systems injury rate improved

Kitchen Ventilation Systems's TCR fell 1.0 from 2.7 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.7 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333413 · Kings Mountain, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 66% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #9/18
  • PHOTO INDUSTRIAL VENTILATI…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: INDUSTRIAL VENTILATION SYSTEMS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Kitchen Ventilation Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kitchen Ventilation Systems averages 2.2 TCR (66% of the Ventilating fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kitchen Ventilation Systems TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Kitchen Ventilation Systems falls in its industry

232 Ventilating fans, industrial a establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 18 Ventilating fans, industrial a employers in North Carolina.

Kitchen Ventilation Systems (82 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Kitchen Ventilation Systems
Kitchen Ventilation Systems (82 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Kitchen Ventilation Systems has fewer employees than the Ventilating fans, industrial and commerc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.3 2.9 3 0 0
2016 2.7 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333413 · NC · Kings Mountain

232 Ventilating fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 64 employers in Kings Mountain, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR INDUSTRIAL VENTILATION SYSTEMS 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR AAF Flanders Momence 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tiernan Aeration, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Camfil Crystal Lake 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Robert & Wade Glover Farms Inc. 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE SouthEnd Exteriors 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE CT Wilson Construction Company 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE JAMES L CAYTON ACCOCIATES INC 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hanesbrands, Inc. Cleveland Distribution Center 515 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6903_15950 397 FTE
CITY-NEAR KINGS MOUNTAIN NC 370 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hanesbrands, Inc. Canterbury Distribution Center 368 FTE
NAT-TCR Muncie 01 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rudolph and Sletten UCSF PCMB #1056697 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR DoubleTree Birmingham 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Trendway Corporation, Holland, MI 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Keystone RV Plant 33 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sewell Mini of Plano 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hobbs Bonded Fibers NA, LLC. 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE VRC Northfield 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.