Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing · Maryland

K.J. Williams Concrete

Name: K.J. Williams Concrete Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Cumberland, MD · ~20 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 19.5
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

K.J. Williams Concrete runs at 590% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

K.J. Williams Concrete: 19.5 TCR = 590% of Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

K.J. Williams Concrete safety composite

K.J. Williams Concrete scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 19.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers
DART rate: F 4.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

K.J. Williams Concrete: 18.7 → 20.3 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 20.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.21× in 2022

K.J. Williams Concrete's TCR rose 1.6 from 18.7 in 2021 to 20.3 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327390 · Cumberland, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 19.5 · 590% of ind

DART 4.1 DART
RANK #7/7
PHOTO Plant 30
BOOK 2y book
INJ 9 inj
SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Plant 30 (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Thompson Preca

19.7
This site

19.5
Plant 30

19.4
Barbour Concre

18.9
Evergreen Pre-

18.1

What this shows K.J. Williams Concrete averages 19.5 TCR (590% of the Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

K.J. Williams Concrete TCR series: 2021=18.7 · 2022=20.3 · BLS 3.3

Where K.J. Williams Concrete falls in its industry

790 Architectural wall panels, pre establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Architectural wall panels, pre employers in Maryland.

K.J. Williams Concrete (20 employees, TCR 19.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.6

K.J. Williams Concrete has fewer employees than the Architectural wall panels, precast concr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2022	20.3	4.1	4	1	0
2021	18.7	3.7	5	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327390 · MD · Cumberland

790 Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 58 employers in Cumberland, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Plant 30	HUDSON, NH	19.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Thompson Precast	PAINESVILLE, OH	19.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Barbour Concrete Company	INDEPENDENCE, MO	18.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Evergreen Pre-Cast, Inc	SUMNER, WA	18.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Hurlock Hatchery #26	HURLOCK	20 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Perryman Station	ABERDEEN	20 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Aberdeen Proving Grounds	ABERDEEN PROVING GROUNDS	20 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Rockville Station	ROCKVILLE	20 FTE
CITY-NEAR	UPMC Western Maryland	Cumberland	1,984 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Hunter Douglas Fabrication	Cumberland	729 FTE
CITY-NEAR	American Woodmark Corp.	Cumberland	563 FTE
CITY-NEAR	American Woodmark Corporation - Allegany Plant	Cumberland	537 FTE
NAT-TCR	287186-Stl-Gaffney Br	St Louis, MO	19.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	6458-ZERC	Farmington, NY	19.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Seneca Health Care Center LLC	West Seneca, NY	19.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Crbg, LLC	Whitefish, MT	19.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Your Building Centers - Milton	Milton, PA	20 FTE
NAT-SIZE	HDS-DeKalb	Dekalb, IL	20 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Larson Pool Plastering	Salt Lake City, UT	20 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Crestmarc Residential Inc.	Dallas, TX	20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.