Industrial robot cells manufacturing · Michigan

KLB - KUKA Systems N.A. LLC

Livonia, MI · ~138 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

KLB - KUKA Systems N.A. LLC runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Industrial robot cells manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

KLB - KUKA Systems N.A. LLC: 2.0 TCR = 61% of Industrial robot cells manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

KLB - KUKA Systems N.A. LLC safety composite

KLB - KUKA Systems N.A. LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

KLB - KUKA Systems N.A. LLC: 0.0 → 1.1 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 4.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.55× in 2024

KLB - KUKA Systems N.A. LLC's TCR rose 1.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333998 · Livonia, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 61% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #7/10
  • PHOTO Pentair Filtration S…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~138 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pentair Filtration Solutions (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

KLB - KUKA Systems N.A. LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows KLB - KUKA Systems N.A. LLC averages 2.0 TCR (61% of the Industrial robot cells manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

KLB - KUKA Systems N.A. LLC TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where KLB - KUKA Systems N.A. LLC falls in its industry

34 Industrial robot cells manufac establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 10 Industrial robot cells manufac employers in Michigan.

KLB - KUKA Systems N.A. LLC (138 employees, TCR 2.0) among 16 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 17 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate KLB - KUKA Systems N.A. LLC
KLB - KUKA Systems N.A. LLC (138 employees, TCR 2.0) among 16 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 2.7

KLB - KUKA Systems N.A. LLC has fewer employees than the Industrial robot cells manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2023 0.7 0.7 2 0 0
2022 1.1 0.8 3 0 0
2021 3.5 3.5 6 4 0
2020 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2019 4.8 1.6 3 0 0
2018 2.1 1.3 5 0 0
2017 3.1 0.5 5 1 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333998 · MI · Livonia

34 Industrial robot cells manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 282 employers in Livonia, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pentair Filtration Solutions 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tyco Fire Protection Products 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6773_15687 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR FANUC - Hoffman Estates 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Water Authority - Central Services Facility 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE DVM Utilities, Inc. 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Butcher and Butcher Construction 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3211 Battle Creek Mill 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR System Office - Livonia 6,768 FTE
CITY-NEAR Livonia Transmission Plant 3,122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Livonia Transmission 2,968 FTE
CITY-NEAR Acro Service 2,701 FTE
NAT-TCR 53 Clark Street 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Store #32 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Garrison Steel Fabricators, Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ong Wr Mustang Sc 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1750/3249 Keystone Topeka 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fresh Mark Cold Storage 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE 400 Community Dr 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE XAU 138 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.