Agriculture production or harvesting crews · Georgia

KMA Employee Leasing

Lake Park, GA · ~159 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

KMA Employee Leasing runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Agriculture production or harvesting crews workplace, earning a grade B.

KMA Employee Leasing: 2.6 TCR = 58% of Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

KMA Employee Leasing safety composite

KMA Employee Leasing scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−67.9

2016→2024

KMA Employee Leasing injury rate improved

KMA Employee Leasing's TCR fell 67.9 from 72.1 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 72.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=72.1 · 2017=52.3 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=0.7 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115115 · Lake Park, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 58% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO Labastida Brothers
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~159 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Labastida Brothers (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

KMA Employee Leasing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows KMA Employee Leasing averages 2.6 TCR (58% of the Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

KMA Employee Leasing TCR series: 2016=72.1 · 2017=52.3 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=0.7 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 4.5

Where KMA Employee Leasing falls in its industry

836 Agriculture production or harv establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Agriculture production or harv employers in Georgia.

KMA Employee Leasing (159 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate KMA Employee Leasing
KMA Employee Leasing (159 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4

KMA Employee Leasing has more employees than the Agriculture production or harvesting cre median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 4.2 7 0 0
2023 3.4 3.4 6 0 0
2022 0.1 0.1 9 0 0
2020 0.7 0.7 1 1 0
2019 3.8 2.5 3 0 0
2018 3.5 3.5 3 0 0
2017 52.3 17.4 3 0 0
2016 72.1 56.1 8 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115115 · GA · Lake Park

836 Agriculture production or harvesting crews employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 20 employers in Lake Park, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Labastida Brothers 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR T-Y Nursery, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley Labor Services Inc 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Enrique's Vineyard Management, Inc. 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vogtle Nuclear Plant 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cargill Agricultural Supply Chain - Gainesville 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlanta Manufacturing Facility 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Finishing 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADA Harvesting, LLC 501 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trejo Labor Service, LLC 458 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5085 LAKE PARK RDC 398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trejo Brothers Produce, LLC 310 FTE
NAT-TCR Air Tractor, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR David E. Looper & Company, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Richmond 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Enfield Store 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Component Assembly Systems PA 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jerseyville Manor 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE ATI Specialty Materials - Bakers North 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE East Coast Metal Systems, Inc. 159 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.