Manufacturer of Wool Fiberglass Insulation · Indiana

Knauf Insulation Plant 3

Shelbyville, IN · ~142 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Knauf Insulation Plant 3 runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Manufacturer of Wool Fiberglass Insulation workplace, earning a grade C.

Knauf Insulation Plant 3: 2.7 TCR = 83% of Manufacturer of Wool Fiberglass Insulation BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Knauf Insulation Plant 3 safety composite

Knauf Insulation Plant 3 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2016→2024

Knauf Insulation Plant 3 injury rate improved

Knauf Insulation Plant 3's TCR fell 3.6 from 6.2 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.2 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327993 · Shelbyville, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 83% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #6/8
  • PHOTO 3003_5804
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~142 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 3003_5804 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Knauf Insulation Plant 3 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Knauf Insulation Plant 3 averages 2.7 TCR (83% of the Manufacturer of Wool Fiberglass Insulation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Knauf Insulation Plant 3 TCR series: 2016=6.2 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Knauf Insulation Plant 3 falls in its industry

101 Manufacturer of Wool Fiberglas establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 8 Manufacturer of Wool Fiberglas employers in Indiana.

Knauf Insulation Plant 3 (142 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Knauf Insulation Plant 3
Knauf Insulation Plant 3 (142 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Knauf Insulation Plant 3 has more employees than the Manufacturer of Wool Fiberglass Insulati median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 2.6 5 0 0
2023 1.3 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2021 2.4 1.2 4 0 0
2020 1.9 1.9 3 0 0
2019 3.2 1.6 6 0 0
2018 1.7 1.7 3 0 0
2017 4.8 3.0 8 0 0
2016 6.2 4.4 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327993 · IN · Shelbyville

101 Manufacturer of Wool Fiberglass Insulation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 69 employers in Shelbyville, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 3003_5804 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Armstrong Hilliard Plant 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chester 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quietflex Manufacturing Company, L.P.-FL 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE SCHOTT North America, Home Tech 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Janus IN 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE CrossRoads Plant 501 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Keystone Plant 41 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana Grand 1,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR HORSESHOE INDIANAPOLIS 877 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ryobi Die Casting (USA) INC 779 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penske : 5076-00 Kroger-DCM/Shelbyville, IN 581 FTE
NAT-TCR UVC 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lenoir Site 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hollywood Casino St. Louis 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Park & Recreation 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE LSX 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Primex Plastics Mesquite 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brunswick Ga 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fujifilm Electronic Materials U.S.A., Inc. 142 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.