Hydroelectric generating facility construction · Washington

Knight Const. & Supply, Inc.

Deer Park, WA · ~100 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Knight Const. & Supply, Inc. runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hydroelectric generating facility construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Knight Const. & Supply, Inc.: 2.4 TCR = 85% of Hydroelectric generating facility construction BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Knight Const. & Supply, Inc. safety composite

Knight Const. & Supply, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2021→2024

Knight Const. & Supply, Inc. injury rate improved

Knight Const. & Supply, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.1 from 3.9 in 2021 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=3.9 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Deer Park, WA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 85% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #12/26
  • PHOTO Chickamauga Lock Rep…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chickamauga Lock Replacement Project (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Knight Const. & Supply, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Knight Const. & Supply, Inc. averages 2.4 TCR (85% of the Hydroelectric generating facility construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Knight Const. & Supply, Inc. TCR series: 2021=3.9 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=1 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Knight Const. & Supply, Inc. falls in its industry

932 Hydroelectric generating facil establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 26 Hydroelectric generating facil employers in Washington.

Knight Const. & Supply, Inc. (100 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Knight Const. & Supply, Inc.
Knight Const. & Supply, Inc. (100 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Knight Const. & Supply, Inc. has more employees than the Hydroelectric generating facility constr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2023 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.7 0.9 2 1 0
2021 3.9 3.0 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · WA · Deer Park

932 Hydroelectric generating facility construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 6 employers in Deer Park, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chickamauga Lock Replacement Project 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southwind Construction Corp. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ESCO Construction Co 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR J.M. Smucker Company 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Flower World Inc 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Big Creek Fisheries, LLC 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lakeside Industries - Greater Seattle 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stacy and Witbeck/Kiewit/Hoffman, A Joint Venture - L200 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northwest Steel Fab Inc 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR Servpro of Northwest Spokane 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR 678 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR 205 Evergreen Truss 28 FTE
NAT-TCR D.R. Horton, Inc. - Midwest (Fort Wayne) 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Branch 3801 - Glendale 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Vigor Alaska 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bulldog Steel Products Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shelby County Jail 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Autumnwood of Deckerville 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Inn at Belden Village 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Park Village Assisted Living 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.