Janitorial services · Michigan

Knight Facilities Management, Inc.

Saginaw, MI · ~279 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Knight Facilities Management, Inc. runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Janitorial services workplace, earning a grade A.

Knight Facilities Management, Inc.: 1.2 TCR = 27% of Janitorial services BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Knight Facilities Management, Inc. safety composite

Knight Facilities Management, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2018→2024

Knight Facilities Management, Inc. injury rate improved

Knight Facilities Management, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.6 from 1.4 in 2018 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.4 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Saginaw, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #14/114
  • PHOTO Sheridan SD 208 Empl
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~279 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sheridan SD 208 Empl (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Knight Facilities Management, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Knight Facilities Management, Inc. averages 1.2 TCR (27% of the Janitorial services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Knight Facilities Management, Inc. TCR series: 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Knight Facilities Management, Inc. falls in its industry

4,064 Janitorial services establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 114 Janitorial services employers in Michigan.

Knight Facilities Management, Inc. (279 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Knight Facilities Management, Inc.
Knight Facilities Management, Inc. (279 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Knight Facilities Management, Inc. has more employees than the Janitorial services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.4 2 0 0
2023 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 1.8 0.9 4 0 0
2021 1.8 1.4 4 0 0
2020 0.9 0.9 2 0 0
2019 1.3 0.3 4 0 0
2018 1.4 0.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · MI · Saginaw

4,064 Janitorial services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 278 employers in Saginaw, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sheridan SD 208 Empl 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR GSA DALLAS 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT PICKWICK CENTER 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phoenix- Commercial Mountain Division 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Center Line Electric, Inc. 279 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4057_7882 279 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate Offices 279 FTE
STATE-SIZE GFL Environmental USA Inc. - Wayne, MI 279 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nexteer Automotive Saginaw Site 4,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR 700 Cooper 2,129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morley - Saginaw 2,039 FTE
CITY-NEAR Caravan Facilities Management 1,677 FTE
NAT-TCR Elizabeth River 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Southgate Campus Centre 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Methodist Hospital Northlake & Retail 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Dresser-Rand Horsham Service Center 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE CMC Steel Florida 279 FTE
NAT-SIZE O'Neill Vintners and Distillers 279 FTE
NAT-SIZE AHOSKIE 279 FTE
NAT-SIZE Casa Mechanical Services - New Braunfels 279 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.