Trucking, general freight, local · Arizona

Knight Transportation - Arizona Ports

Phoenix, AZ · ~92 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Knight Transportation - Arizona Ports runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Trucking, general freight, local workplace, earning a grade A.

Knight Transportation - Arizona Ports: 2.0 TCR = 44% of Trucking, general freight, local BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Knight Transportation - Arizona Ports safety composite

Knight Transportation - Arizona Ports scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Knight Transportation - Arizona Ports: 0.9 → 2.3 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.15× in 2024

Knight Transportation - Arizona Ports's TCR rose 1.3 from 0.9 in 2021 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484110 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.0 · 44% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #10/36
  • PHOTO Mid-East Truck & Tra…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~92 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mid-East Truck & Tractor Service, Inc. OHIO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Knight Transportation - Arizona Ports in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Knight Transportation - Arizona Ports averages 2.0 TCR (44% of the Trucking, general freight, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Knight Transportation - Arizona Ports TCR series: 2021=0.9 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Knight Transportation - Arizona Ports falls in its industry

2,784 Trucking, general freight, loc establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 36 Trucking, general freight, loc employers in Arizona.

Knight Transportation - Arizona Ports (92 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Knight Transportation - Arizona Ports
Knight Transportation - Arizona Ports (92 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Knight Transportation - Arizona Ports has more employees than the Trucking, general freight, local median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2023 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2022 3.5 0.7 5 0 0
2021 0.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484110 · AZ · Phoenix

2,784 Trucking, general freight, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mid-East Truck & Tractor Service, Inc. OHIO 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR EVO Transportation and Energy Services 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LBA Logistics LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR JFM Logistics Management, Inc. 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Paradise Valley Office Bldg A 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meritage Homes of Colorado 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mosaic Prescott Office 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prescott Foothills 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Rivergate 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR S10257 - Norcross Hauling 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Carolina Burke Operator LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Raleigh Court Operations LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Folwell 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Michels Power Inc-MN-Ostego 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westec Plastics Corporation 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bridgeview Estates 92 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.