Ammunition boxes, wood, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Konz Wood Products - Appleton Lumber Company

Appleton, WI · ~70 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Konz Wood Products - Appleton Lumber Company runs at 388% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Ammunition boxes, wood, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Konz Wood Products - Appleton Lumber Company: 12.8 TCR = 388% of Ammunition boxes, wood, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Konz Wood Products - Appleton Lumber Company safety composite

Konz Wood Products - Appleton Lumber Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 17% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

12/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.9

2022→2023

Konz Wood Products - Appleton Lumber Company injury rate improved

Konz Wood Products - Appleton Lumber Company's TCR fell 5.9 from 15.8 in 2022 to 9.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 15.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=15.8 · 2023=9.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321920 · Appleton, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.8 · 388% of ind

  • DART 8.6 DART
  • RANK #34/46
  • PHOTO Pallet Source, Inc.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pallet Source, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Konz Wood Products - Appleton Lumber Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Konz Wood Products - Appleton Lumber Company averages 12.8 TCR (388% of the Ammunition boxes, wood, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Konz Wood Products - Appleton Lumber Company TCR series: 2022=15.8 · 2023=9.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Konz Wood Products - Appleton Lumber Company falls in its industry

952 Ammunition boxes, wood, manufa establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 46 Ammunition boxes, wood, manufa employers in Wisconsin.

Konz Wood Products - Appleton Lumber Company (70 employees, TCR 12.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Konz Wood Products - Appleton Lumber Company
Konz Wood Products - Appleton Lumber Company (70 employees, TCR 12.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3

Konz Wood Products - Appleton Lumber Company has more employees than the Ammunition boxes, wood, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 9.8 8.6 8 0 1
2022 15.8 10.5 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321920 · WI · Appleton

952 Ammunition boxes, wood, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 356 employers in Appleton, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pallet Source, Inc. 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR QUALITY PALLET 12.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yoderbilt, LLC 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anderson Forest Products, Inc 12.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE La Crosse Service Center-9N 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Friendship 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michels Paving- Brownsville 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE QBC, LLC 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center Appleton 1,649 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center-Appleton 1,563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northern Operations 1,321 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fox Valley Technical College (WI) 1,279 FTE
NAT-TCR Stonepeak Ceramics, Inc. 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Zumbrota Health Services 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Inland Empire Paper Company 12.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Kinross Fab & Machine 12.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Upper Saint Clair 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Theisen's of Ames 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE America's Thrift Store #13 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main office 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.