Glassware for industrial, scientific, and technical use made in glass making plants · Pennsylvania

Kopp Glass

Pittsburgh, PA · ~79 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kopp Glass runs at 171% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Glassware for industrial, scientific, and technical use made in glass making plants workplace, earning a grade D.

Kopp Glass: 5.7 TCR = 171% of Glassware for industrial, scientific, and technical use made in glass making plants BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kopp Glass safety composite

Kopp Glass scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2016→2024

Kopp Glass injury rate improved

Kopp Glass's TCR fell 3.1 from 4.7 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=12.0 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=2.0 · 2023=11.2 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327212 · Pittsburgh, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 171% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/8
  • PHOTO Saint-Gobain ADFORS …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Saint-Gobain ADFORS Dublin, Ga (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Kopp Glass in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kopp Glass averages 5.7 TCR (171% of the Glassware for industrial, scientific, and technical use made in glass making plants BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kopp Glass TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=12 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=2 · 2023=11.2 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Kopp Glass falls in its industry

75 Glassware for industrial, scie establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 8 Glassware for industrial, scie employers in Pennsylvania.

Kopp Glass (79 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 141 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Kopp Glass
Kopp Glass (79 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 141 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Kopp Glass has fewer employees than the Glassware for industrial, scientific, an median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2023 11.2 7.5 5 1 0
2022 2.0 0.0 0 1 0
2021 3.8 1.9 2 0 0
2020 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2019 7.2 6.0 6 0 0
2018 12.0 10.9 11 0 0
2017 6.7 5.9 9 0 0
2016 4.7 4.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327212 · PA · Pittsburgh

75 Glassware for industrial, scientific, and technical use made in glass making plants employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Saint-Gobain ADFORS Dublin, Ga 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anchor Hocking 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paragon Tempered Glass - Ohio 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coherent Richmond 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE John C. Leo & Son, LLC 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE C.J. Mushroom Co., LLC 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ernst Conservation Seeds Inc 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Specialty Egg 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Plummer Concrete 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Prestress Services Industries of Ohio 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Store #55 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Aurora 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Airwest Engineering 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Century Foundry Inc. 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE E/M Coating Services 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chief Construction 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.