Electrical work · Ohio

Kraft Electrical & Telecommunications Services - Cincinnati

Cincinnati, OH · ~79 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kraft Electrical & Telecommunications Services - Cincinnati runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electrical work workplace, earning a grade A.

Kraft Electrical & Telecommunications Services - Cincinnati: 1.2 TCR = 44% of Electrical work BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kraft Electrical & Telecommunications Services - Cincinnati safety composite

Kraft Electrical & Telecommunications Services - Cincinnati scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Kraft Electrical & Telecommunications Services - Cincinnati held a steady TCR band

Kraft Electrical & Telecommunications Services - Cincinnati's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.2 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 1.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.2 · 2017=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 44% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #66/218
  • PHOTO T.M. Bier & Associat…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: T.M. Bier & Associates, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Kraft Electrical & Telecommunications Services - Cincinnati in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kraft Electrical & Telecommunications Services - Cincinnati averages 1.2 TCR (44% of the Electrical work BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kraft Electrical & Telecommunications Services - Cincinnati TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2017=1.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Kraft Electrical & Telecommunications Services - Cincinnati falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical work establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #66 safest of 218 Electrical work employers in Ohio.

Kraft Electrical & Telecommunications Services - Cincinnati (79 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Kraft Electrical & Telecommunications Services - Cincinnati
Kraft Electrical & Telecommunications Services - Cincinnati (79 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Kraft Electrical & Telecommunications Services - Cincinnati has more employees than the Electrical work median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2016 1.2 1.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · OH · Cincinnati

4,550 Electrical work employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR T.M. Bier & Associates, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR AG Group LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goss Electric LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Electric Group (CA) Inc. 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Canton South Service Center 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE RedBuilt Ohio 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kokosing, Inc. 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hi-Way Paving, Inc. 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Powhatan Reception and Classification Center 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bridgeport 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR San Marcos Operations 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Us Inside Sales - Phoenix (Azs51) 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE ADS Charlotte 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Branson LLC 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cascades - IFC Disposables Inc. 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE The John Clarke Retirement Center 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.