Target drones, aircraft, manufacturing · California

Kratos Unmanned Aerial Systems CASA1

Sacramento, CA · ~284 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kratos Unmanned Aerial Systems CASA1 runs at 203% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Target drones, aircraft, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Kratos Unmanned Aerial Systems CASA1: 6.7 TCR = 203% of Target drones, aircraft, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kratos Unmanned Aerial Systems CASA1 safety composite

Kratos Unmanned Aerial Systems CASA1 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2021→2024

Kratos Unmanned Aerial Systems CASA1 injury rate improved

Kratos Unmanned Aerial Systems CASA1's TCR fell 1.6 from 4.9 in 2021 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 16.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=4.9 · 2022=16.9 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336411 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.7 · 203% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #98/107
  • PHOTO Ikhana
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~284 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ikhana (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Kratos Unmanned Aerial Systems CASA1 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kratos Unmanned Aerial Systems CASA1 averages 6.7 TCR (203% of the Target drones, aircraft, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kratos Unmanned Aerial Systems CASA1 TCR series: 2021=4.9 · 2022=16.9 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Kratos Unmanned Aerial Systems CASA1 falls in its industry

390 Target drones, aircraft, manuf establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #98 safest of 107 Target drones, aircraft, manuf employers in California.

Kratos Unmanned Aerial Systems CASA1 (284 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 151 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Kratos Unmanned Aerial Systems CASA1
Kratos Unmanned Aerial Systems CASA1 (284 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 151 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Kratos Unmanned Aerial Systems CASA1 has more employees than the Target drones, aircraft, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 3.0 7 2 0
2023 1.7 1.7 3 1 0
2022 16.9 16.1 8 35 0
2021 4.9 4.9 11 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336411 · CA · Sacramento

390 Target drones, aircraft, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ikhana 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR HDI Landing Gear USA Springfield Site 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Safran Landing Systems (MKE) 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avmax-GTF 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE TRI Pointe Homes San Ramon Division 284 FTE
STATE-SIZE Braga Fresh Foods 284 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quidel Corporation - Manufacturing 284 FTE
STATE-SIZE North America : Vista 284 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Harvester Foundry 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Continental Tire the Americas, LLC 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR People's Food Coop 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Northern Lights Candles 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 056 - E Michigan Ave Jackson 284 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Central Region WSOT 284 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holsum Bakery, Inc. 284 FTE
NAT-SIZE GUM-GH 284 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.