Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly · Connecticut

Kre-Bsl Husky South Farms Operation LLC

Middletown, CT · ~100 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
20.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kre-Bsl Husky South Farms Operation LLC runs at 529% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly workplace, earning a grade F.

Kre-Bsl Husky South Farms Operation LLC: 20.1 TCR = 529% of Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kre-Bsl Husky South Farms Operation LLC safety composite

Kre-Bsl Husky South Farms Operation LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 20.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.8

2019→2024

Kre-Bsl Husky South Farms Operation LLC injury rate improved

Kre-Bsl Husky South Farms Operation LLC's TCR fell 7.8 from 20.1 in 2019 to 12.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 38.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=20.1 · 2020=38.8 · 2021=20.1 · 2022=11.5 · 2023=17.9 · 2024=12.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Middletown, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 20.1 · 529% of ind

  • DART 9.6 DART
  • RANK #90/100
  • PHOTO 10329
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 47 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 10329 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Kre-Bsl Husky South Farms Operation LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kre-Bsl Husky South Farms Operation LLC averages 20.1 TCR (529% of the Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kre-Bsl Husky South Farms Operation LLC TCR series: 2019=20.1 · 2020=38.8 · 2021=20.1 · 2022=11.5 · 2023=17.9 · 2024=12.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Kre-Bsl Husky South Farms Operation LLC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted Living Facilities for establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #90 safest of 100 Assisted Living Facilities for employers in Connecticut.

Kre-Bsl Husky South Farms Operation LLC (100 employees, TCR 20.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Kre-Bsl Husky South Farms Operation LLC
Kre-Bsl Husky South Farms Operation LLC (100 employees, TCR 20.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Kre-Bsl Husky South Farms Operation LLC has more employees than the Assisted Living Facilities for the Elder median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.3 9.6 9 0 0
2023 17.9 11.9 9 3 0
2022 11.5 10.1 3 5 0
2021 20.1 20.1 5 9 0
2020 38.8 35.9 7 20 0
2019 20.1 18.6 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CT · Middletown

6,510 Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 119 employers in Middletown, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 10329 20.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Inn at Walker Mill 20.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Neese RD Woodstock 20.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10087 20.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hobbs Inc 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Works 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE All State Construction Inc. 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE NPI Medical Inc. 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pratt & Whitney Middletown 2,686 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIDDLESEX HEALTH SYSTEM INC. 2,666 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-MIDD 1,435 FTE
CITY-NEAR Middletown Public Schools 1,105 FTE
NAT-TCR AZP032 20.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0127 Los Altos 20.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Temecula #056 20.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZHLN 20.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sarasota Art Ovation Hotel 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brandon Court Nursing Home DBA Rankin Community Care Center 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dober Chemical Corp 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Siema Construction LLC Lafayette 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.