Retaining wall, masonry (i.e., block, brick, stone), construction · California

Kretschmar & Smith, Inc.

Riverside, CA · ~39 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kretschmar & Smith, Inc. runs at 191% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Retaining wall, masonry (i.e., block, brick, stone), construction workplace, earning a grade D.

Kretschmar & Smith, Inc.: 5.3 TCR = 191% of Retaining wall, masonry (i.e., block, brick, stone), construction BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kretschmar & Smith, Inc. safety composite

Kretschmar & Smith, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Kretschmar & Smith, Inc.: 5.5 → 10.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 10.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.97× in 2024

Kretschmar & Smith, Inc.'s TCR rose 5.0 from 5.5 in 2017 to 10.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238140 · Riverside, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 191% of ind

  • DART 10.5 DART
  • RANK #39/77
  • PHOTO J.A.M. Construction,…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: J.A.M. Construction, Inc. of NC FL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Kretschmar & Smith, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kretschmar & Smith, Inc. averages 5.3 TCR (191% of the Retaining wall, masonry (i.e., block, brick, stone), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kretschmar & Smith, Inc. TCR series: 2017=5.5 · 2018=6 · 2019=10.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=10.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Kretschmar & Smith, Inc. falls in its industry

703 Retaining wall, masonry (i.e., establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 77 Retaining wall, masonry (i.e., employers in California.

Kretschmar & Smith, Inc. (39 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Kretschmar & Smith, Inc.
Kretschmar & Smith, Inc. (39 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Kretschmar & Smith, Inc. has fewer employees than the Retaining wall, masonry (i.e., block, br median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.5 10.5 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.9 4.9 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 10.6 7.9 4 0 0
2018 6.0 6.0 2 0 0
2017 5.5 2.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238140 · CA · Riverside

703 Retaining wall, masonry (i.e., block, brick, stone), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 536 employers in Riverside, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR J.A.M. Construction, Inc. of NC FL 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Architectural Stone LLC 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR South West Masonry, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caretti Inc. 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE San Felipe Farms 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schreiner Brothers Farms 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE TLC Custom Farming Company LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sonoma Valley Vineyards 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Riverside 8,676 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-21 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Community Hospital 2,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08681351 RIVERSIDE MED CENTER 2,349 FTE
NAT-TCR BR Johnson- Syracuse 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Georgetown Assisted Living 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Spokane 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Paddock Construction Company Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Broadway 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE TW Metals - Atlanta 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quality Cable Contractors Inc. Main Office 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE D & D Drilling, Inc. 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.