Farm tractors and attachments manufacturing · Georgia

Kubota Industrial Equipment

Jefferson, GA · ~1,090 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kubota Industrial Equipment runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Farm tractors and attachments manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Kubota Industrial Equipment: 0.7 TCR = 22% of Farm tractors and attachments manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kubota Industrial Equipment safety composite

Kubota Industrial Equipment scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2023

Kubota Industrial Equipment injury rate improved

Kubota Industrial Equipment's TCR fell 0.4 from 0.8 in 2016 to 0.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.8 · 2017=1.0 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333111 · Jefferson, GA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #4/17
  • PHOTO Landoll Corporation,…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 75 inj
  • SIZE ~1,090 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Landoll Corporation, ICON (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Kubota Industrial Equipment in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kubota Industrial Equipment averages 0.7 TCR (22% of the Farm tractors and attachments manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kubota Industrial Equipment TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2017=1 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Kubota Industrial Equipment falls in its industry

433 Farm tractors and attachments establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 17 Farm tractors and attachments employers in Georgia.

Kubota Industrial Equipment (1,090 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Kubota Industrial Equipment
Kubota Industrial Equipment (1,090 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Kubota Industrial Equipment has more employees than the Farm tractors and attachments manufactur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.3 0.2 6 0 0
2022 0.9 0.9 14 0 0
2021 0.8 0.8 12 0 0
2020 0.8 0.6 10 0 0
2019 0.8 0.7 10 0 0
2018 0.5 0.3 6 0 0
2017 1.0 0.5 8 0 0
2016 0.8 0.7 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333111 · GA · Jefferson

433 Farm tractors and attachments manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 62 employers in Jefferson, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Landoll Corporation, ICON 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4652_10552 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR K-C Welding & Rentals, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maxijet, Inc. 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chesley Brown International 1,086 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lin R Rogers Electrical Contractors 1,081 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ceres Savannah 1,081 FTE
STATE-SIZE UCB Smyrna 1,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MGE5 2,098 FTE
CITY-NEAR HomeGoods Jefferson Distribution Center 1,274 FTE
CITY-NEAR H.G. Georgia Merchants, LLC 1,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : MGE5 1,248 FTE
NAT-TCR Orsted - Providence 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Warren 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Northgate Hampton Inn & Suites 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR North America Fire Equipment Co., Inc. West 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Horseshoe Baltimore Maryland Casino 1,090 FTE
NAT-SIZE Methodist Hospital of Sacramento 1,090 FTE
NAT-SIZE Minnesota Department of Health 1,090 FTE
NAT-SIZE Location 48020 1,090 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.