General Warehousing & Storage · Pennsylvania

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ALU-6469)

Alburtis, PA · ~196 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ALU-6469) runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General Warehousing & Storage workplace, earning a grade B.

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ALU-6469): 4.0 TCR = 70% of General Warehousing & Storage BLS 5.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ALU-6469) safety composite

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ALU-6469) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2019→2023

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ALU-6469) injury rate improved

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ALU-6469)'s TCR fell 5.4 from 6.0 in 2019 to 0.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=6.0 · 2020=7.5 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=3.0 · 2023=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Alburtis, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.0 · 70% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #334/650
  • PHOTO Amazon.com Services …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~196 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amazon.com Services LLC - DCA1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ALU-6469) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ALU-6469) averages 4.0 TCR (70% of the General Warehousing & Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ALU-6469) TCR series: 2019=6 · 2020=7.5 · 2021=3 · 2022=3 · 2023=0.7 · BLS 5.8

Where Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ALU-6469) falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing & Storage establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #334 safest of 650 General Warehousing & Storage employers in Pennsylvania.

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ALU-6469) (196 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ALU-6469)
Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ALU-6469) (196 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (ALU-6469) has more employees than the General Warehousing & Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.7 0.7 2 0 0
2022 3.0 2.4 9 0 0
2021 3.0 3.0 4 0 0
2020 7.5 5.8 8 1 0
2019 6.0 4.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · PA · Alburtis

9,477 General Warehousing & Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 14 employers in Alburtis, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DCA1 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR HC Elyria 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 04606300-00W009 QUIET LOGISTICS, INC.-QUIET LOGISTICS, INC. 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tools of Marketing, Inc 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE JWCF, LP 196 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kistler O'Brien Fire Protection 196 FTE
STATE-SIZE Team Ten LLC dba American Eagle Paper Mills 196 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pratt Industries, Allentown Corrugated, LLC 196 FTE
CITY-NEAR Verizon Alburtis 250 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ryder System Inc. 230 FTE
CITY-NEAR DCM : 4270-00 Knoll-DCM/Alburtis, PA 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR ALBURTIS PA DISTRIBUTION CENTER 147 FTE
NAT-TCR Food World 794 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lockeford Facility - 04 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 210 East 64th Street 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1513 GOFFSTOWN, NH 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE UW Health Rehabilitation Hospital - 4074 196 FTE
NAT-SIZE Applied Solutions Group (ASG) : ANCRA Azusa 196 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plattsburgh #168 196 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wilton #039 196 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.