General Warehousing + Storage · Arizona

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (DVH-6385)

Phoenix, AZ · ~28 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (DVH-6385) runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General Warehousing + Storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (DVH-6385): 2.4 TCR = 42% of General Warehousing + Storage BLS 5.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (DVH-6385) safety composite

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (DVH-6385) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2017→2023

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (DVH-6385) injury rate improved

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (DVH-6385)'s TCR fell 4.0 from 4.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=6.2 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.4 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #45/171
  • PHOTO Portage - 6410 Ameri…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Portage - 6410 Ameriplex Drive (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (DVH-6385) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (DVH-6385) averages 2.4 TCR (42% of the General Warehousing + Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (DVH-6385) TCR series: 2017=4 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=6.2 · 2023=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (DVH-6385) falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing + Storage establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 171 General Warehousing + Storage employers in Arizona.

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (DVH-6385) (28 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (DVH-6385)
Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (DVH-6385) (28 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (DVH-6385) has fewer employees than the General Warehousing + Storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.2 6.2 2 0 0
2021 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · AZ · Phoenix

9,477 General Warehousing + Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Portage - 6410 Ameriplex Drive 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR NY - Barilla 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR FORT MYERS FL SALES CENTER 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Victorville - 17477 Nisqualli Road 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE ABACA 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tatum 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tonopah 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cholla Livestock 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR pakliteincmebane 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodville Health Care Center Ltd. Co. d/b/a Woodville Health and Rehabilitation Center 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #563 ORMOND BEACH, FL 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #5414 Buford, GA 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (CVG-6327) 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commodity Forwarders Inc. (MIA-5809) 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stevens Integrated Solutions 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Montrose Construction 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.