General Warehousing + Storage · North Carolina

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (RDU25-6419)

Raleigh, NC · ~67 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (RDU25-6419) runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General Warehousing + Storage workplace, earning a grade C.

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (RDU25-6419): 0.0 TCR = 0% of General Warehousing + Storage BLS 5.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (RDU25-6419) safety composite

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (RDU25-6419) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (RDU25-6419) held a steady TCR band

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (RDU25-6419)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.0 TCR.

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Raleigh, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/330
  • PHOTO One Federal Street
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: One Federal Street (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (RDU25-6419) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (RDU25-6419) averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the General Warehousing + Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (RDU25-6419) TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (RDU25-6419) falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing + Storage establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 330 General Warehousing + Storage employers in North Carolina.

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (RDU25-6419) (67 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (RDU25-6419)
Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (RDU25-6419) (67 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (RDU25-6419) has fewer employees than the General Warehousing + Storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NC · Raleigh

9,477 General Warehousing + Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 973 employers in Raleigh, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR One Federal Street 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Portsmouth NNSY Commissary 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eclipse Advantage-DOLLARGENBAL-Bessemer, AL 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Br 101 & 990- Communications Test Design Inc 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 982318 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Field Ops 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Walnut Cove Health & Rehabilitation 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Randolph Senior Adults Association, Inc 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headway Workforce Solutions 13,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC State University 11,491 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Rex Healthcare 7,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR SECU 6,283 FTE
NAT-TCR Keller Warehouse 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Carbro Constructors Corp Main 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1655 3rd St,San Francisco (MB3 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Knoxville/Lenoir City Terminal 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chelsea at Bridgewater 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE STR0182 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baton Rouge Facility 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.