General Warehouse & Storage · Indiana

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (XWT-6599)

Whitestown, IN · ~276 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (XWT-6599) runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General Warehouse & Storage workplace, earning a grade C.

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (XWT-6599): 6.6 TCR = 113% of General Warehouse & Storage BLS 5.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (XWT-6599) safety composite

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (XWT-6599) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.0

2018→2023

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (XWT-6599) injury rate improved

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (XWT-6599)'s TCR fell 7.0 from 13.4 in 2018 to 6.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 13.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=13.4 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=6.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Whitestown, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 6.6 · 113% of ind

  • DART 6.4 DART
  • RANK #307/366
  • PHOTO Caguas
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 57 inj
  • SIZE ~276 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Caguas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (XWT-6599) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (XWT-6599) averages 6.6 TCR (113% of the General Warehouse & Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (XWT-6599) TCR series: 2018=13.4 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=6.4 · BLS 5.8

Where Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (XWT-6599) falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehouse & Storage establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #307 safest of 366 General Warehouse & Storage employers in Indiana.

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (XWT-6599) (276 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (XWT-6599)
Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (XWT-6599) (276 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (XWT-6599) has more employees than the General Warehouse & Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.4 6.4 9 1 0
2022 3.1 2.8 11 0 0
2021 3.6 2.9 11 0 0
2020 8.3 7.5 13 9 0
2019 4.7 4.7 11 0 0
2018 13.4 13.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · IN · Whitestown

9,477 General Warehouse & Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 63 employers in Whitestown, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Caguas 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - HOU3 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - MCE1 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1985 - OWATONNA RETURN CENTER - MN 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE AES Indiana - Petersburg 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indiana Transmission Plant 2 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE Autoneum North America - Jeffersonville IN 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meijer 124 276 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : IND1 2,922 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - IND1 2,502 FTE
CITY-NEAR Express Scripts Pharmacy, Inc. Whitestown, IN 982 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2272-22720275 953 FTE
NAT-TCR Evansville Building 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Navarro Regional LLC 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Park City Lodging, Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Giorgio Foods Inc 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE ENTEK International LLC 276 FTE
NAT-SIZE Augusta Correctional Center 276 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amos 276 FTE
NAT-SIZE LVIP 276 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.