RESIDENTIAL MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE FACILITIES · Kentucky

Kylond-5cb-Rw London

London, KY · ~77 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kylond-5cb-Rw London runs at 384% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical RESIDENTIAL MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE FACILITIES workplace, earning a grade F.

Kylond-5cb-Rw London: 14.6 TCR = 384% of RESIDENTIAL MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE FACILITIES BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kylond-5cb-Rw London safety composite

Kylond-5cb-Rw London scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−44.5

2020→2023

Kylond-5cb-Rw London injury rate improved

Kylond-5cb-Rw London's TCR fell 44.5 from 47.4 in 2020 to 2.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 47.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=47.4 · 2021=8.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · London, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.6 · 384% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/25
  • PHOTO 2007-UCPMC-NIAGARA S…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2007-UCPMC-NIAGARA ST ICF (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Kylond-5cb-Rw London in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kylond-5cb-Rw London averages 14.6 TCR (384% of the RESIDENTIAL MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE FACILITIES BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kylond-5cb-Rw London TCR series: 2020=47.4 · 2021=8.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Kylond-5cb-Rw London falls in its industry

1,165 RESIDENTIAL MENTAL HEALTH AND establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 25 RESIDENTIAL MENTAL HEALTH AND employers in Kentucky.

Kylond-5cb-Rw London (77 employees, TCR 14.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Kylond-5cb-Rw London
Kylond-5cb-Rw London (77 employees, TCR 14.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Kylond-5cb-Rw London has more employees than the RESIDENTIAL MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.9 0.0 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 8.1 5.4 3 3 0
2020 47.4 45.4 0 23 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · KY · London

1,165 RESIDENTIAL MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE FACILITIES employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 71 employers in London, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2007-UCPMC-NIAGARA ST ICF 14.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Skagit County Crisis Center 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commuity Addiction Recovery Enterprise - Fergus Falls 14.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR LifeROOTS Inc 14.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lexington Distribution Operations Center 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Roofing & Metal Lexington 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rabbit Hole Spirits, LLC 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Derby Fabricating Solutions - Louisville 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flowers Bakery of London, LLC 2,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6097 1,005 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6097 917 FTE
CITY-NEAR 16110001-161101 SAINT JOSEPH - LONDON 768 FTE
NAT-TCR 2013-Ucpmc-Kilbane Icf 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR RK-016-Marion ( RK-016 ) 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 159 Draper 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 4054-ABS-0019-0018-00571 14.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Lowry 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seago Health Care Center Ltd. Co. d/b/a The Manor at Seagoville 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dolan Family Health Center 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Massena #32 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.