Administrative management services · California

Kyocera International Fremont

Fremont, CA · ~51 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kyocera International Fremont runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Administrative management services workplace, earning a grade A.

Kyocera International Fremont: 0.7 TCR = 26% of Administrative management services BLS 2.6 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kyocera International Fremont safety composite

Kyocera International Fremont scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2017→2022

Kyocera International Fremont injury rate improved

Kyocera International Fremont's TCR fell 2.0 from 2.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561110 · Fremont, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/61
  • PHOTO Williams Companies T…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Williams Companies Tulsa (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Kyocera International Fremont in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kyocera International Fremont averages 0.7 TCR (26% of the Administrative management services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kyocera International Fremont TCR series: 2017=2 · 2018=0 · 2019=2 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Kyocera International Fremont falls in its industry

544 Administrative management serv establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 61 Administrative management serv employers in California.

Kyocera International Fremont (51 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Kyocera International Fremont
Kyocera International Fremont (51 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Kyocera International Fremont has fewer employees than the Administrative management services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561110 · CA · Fremont

544 Administrative management services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 348 employers in Fremont, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Williams Companies Tulsa 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Business Service Center 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The facilities group 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Twin Cities Orthopedics - Bloomington 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Robert Young Vineyards 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE H&W Vineyards 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huber Farms Inc 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Brothers Farms Inc 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Fremont-45500 Fremont Blvd 21,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Fremont-Factory 12,707 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 517 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lam Research Corp. Fremont Campus 2,887 FTE
NAT-TCR 2133 Gallatin Sheet Plant 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 4527 Cowpens Paper Mill 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR PA - GEN COMM (Camp Hill-381) 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR PA - Quaker (21) 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE USM Store #512 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phoenix Metal Fabricating Inc 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE BrandSafway Solutions, LLC - Raleigh-Durham Branch 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Canyon Creek 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.