Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · California
La Paloma Generating Plant
Mckittrick, CA · ~31 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 0.8
- Avg TCR
- 1.2
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
La Paloma Generating Plant runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade B.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 0.8
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 1.2
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 2
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares La Paloma Generating Plant's OSHA Total Case Rate of 0.8 to the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark of 1.2 (71% of benchmark) across 6 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
La Paloma Generating Plant's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 1.2 industry benchmark.
Where La Paloma Generating Plant falls in its industry
1,164 Electric power generation, fos establishmentsSafer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.
Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 67 Electric power generation, fos employers in California.
Trend analysis for La Paloma Generating Plant
Between 2017 and 2024, La Paloma Generating Plant's Total Case Rate held roughly steady from 0.0 to 0.0 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 0% change across 7 years of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2017, at a TCR of 0.0, while 2019 saw the highest rate, at 2.7, a spread of 2.7 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.
Summed across those 6 reporting years, La Paloma Generating Plant recorded 2 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 6-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 2 injuries shown on this page for La Paloma Generating Plant are sourced from its own 6 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 221112 - Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas).
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 75,458 hours worked = 0.00 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| La Paloma Generating Plant (this establishment) | 0.85 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 6-year avg |
| Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) industry avg | 1.20 | BLS IIF, NAICS 221112 |
| California state avg (all industries) | 5.64 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by La Paloma Generating Plant to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 0 reportable incidents · 0 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2020: 0 reportable incidents · 0 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2019: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2018: 0 reportable incidents · 0 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2017: 0 reportable incidents · 0 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 2.4 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on La Paloma Generating Plant's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.
- At 71% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) benchmark, La Paloma Generating Plant reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is La Paloma Generating Plant's safety grade?
How many injuries has La Paloma Generating Plant reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within California, and by nearby establishments in Mckittrick - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~0.8)
Similar size (~31 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.