Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis · Missouri

Label Solutions, Inc.

Marshfield, MO · ~36 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Label Solutions, Inc. runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis workplace, earning a grade B.

Label Solutions, Inc.: 2.6 TCR = 79% of Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Label Solutions, Inc. safety composite

Label Solutions, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Label Solutions, Inc.: 0.0 → 3.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 6.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Label Solutions, Inc.'s TCR rose 3.3 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 6.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Marshfield, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 79% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #37/61
  • PHOTO Phenix Label
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Phenix Label (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Label Solutions, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Label Solutions, Inc. averages 2.6 TCR (79% of the Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Label Solutions, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=5.6 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Label Solutions, Inc. falls in its industry

2,001 Labels, commercial printing (e establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 61 Labels, commercial printing (e employers in Missouri.

Label Solutions, Inc. (36 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Label Solutions, Inc.
Label Solutions, Inc. (36 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Label Solutions, Inc. has fewer employees than the Labels, commercial printing (except scre median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2023 6.1 3.1 2 0 0
2022 5.6 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2017 5.5 5.5 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · MO · Marshfield

2,001 Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 27 employers in Marshfield, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Phenix Label 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR BTPS/Bookmasters, Inc 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orora Visual New Jersey 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 8647 Savage 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hazelwood, MO 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2564-Marshall, MO 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Asbury Power Station 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Meter Services 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 78 308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tyler Couplings 288 FTE
CITY-NEAR 78 287 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACGI a subsidiary of Armstrong World Industries 175 FTE
NAT-TCR Hydro Resources - Mid-Continent, Ing., Garden City 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lowes Foods #161 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Pumphrey Training Center 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ULA - Pueblo Prop Shop 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bay 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lassiter Lumber Company, LLC 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harker Heights Facility 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sioux City Truck & Trailer Inc 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.