Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing · Louisiana

Lafayette Facility

Lafayette, LA · ~89 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lafayette Facility runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Lafayette Facility: 3.4 TCR = 102% of Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lafayette Facility safety composite

Lafayette Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lafayette Facility: 0.0 → 11.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 11.2 TCR · DART/TCR 3.35× in 2024

Lafayette Facility's TCR rose 11.2 from 0.0 in 2017 to 11.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 3.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311511 · Lafayette, LA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 102% of ind

  • DART 11.2 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Meadow Gold Boise - …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Meadow Gold Boise - Boise (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Lafayette Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lafayette Facility averages 3.4 TCR (102% of the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lafayette Facility TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=11.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Lafayette Facility falls in its industry

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin employers in Louisiana.

Lafayette Facility (89 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lafayette Facility
Lafayette Facility (89 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Lafayette Facility has fewer employees than the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.2 11.2 13 0 0
2023 6.7 6.7 9 0 0
2022 4.8 1.9 3 2 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.1 1.2 6 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311511 · LA · Lafayette

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 312 employers in Lafayette, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Meadow Gold Boise - Boise 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DFA-ST PAUL BEV-MAPLEWOOD MN 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milkco, Inc 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DFA FLUID - CITY OF INDUSTRY CA-SOUTH 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE The McDonnel Group 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE McDermott- LACC 7th Heater and Duplicate Auxiliary Boiler Project 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Turner at Grace Davison Sulphur LA 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Industries LLC 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR Acadian Ambulance 3,166 FTE
CITY-NEAR OLG Lafayette General Medical Center 2,489 FTE
CITY-NEAR Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc. 1,348 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stuller, Inc. Global Headquarters 1,330 FTE
NAT-TCR San Lucas Ag Service Inc 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Stericycle - Miami,FL-8795 NW 58th 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR McDowell-Craig Office Systems 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sedgefield Middle School 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Visiting Angels of Hanover 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Long Beach 218 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Precision Hose, Inc 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pan American Grain Manufacturing Amelia 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.