General warehousing and storage · Indiana

Lafayette Logistics Center

Lafayette, IN · ~289 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lafayette Logistics Center runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Lafayette Logistics Center: 1.5 TCR = 26% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lafayette Logistics Center safety composite

Lafayette Logistics Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Lafayette Logistics Center held a steady TCR band

Lafayette Logistics Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.8 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.8 · 2017=0.9 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Lafayette, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #91/366
  • PHOTO Fostoria DC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~289 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fostoria DC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Lafayette Logistics Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lafayette Logistics Center averages 1.5 TCR (26% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lafayette Logistics Center TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2017=0.9 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=1 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 5.8

Where Lafayette Logistics Center falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #91 safest of 366 General warehousing and storag employers in Indiana.

Lafayette Logistics Center (289 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lafayette Logistics Center
Lafayette Logistics Center (289 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Lafayette Logistics Center has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.6 4 0 0
2023 3.2 2.8 9 0 0
2022 1.0 0.3 3 0 0
2021 0.8 0.4 2 0 0
2020 1.4 1.4 3 0 0
2019 2.2 1.6 7 0 0
2018 2.5 1.3 8 0 0
2017 0.9 0.4 2 0 0
2016 0.8 0.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · IN · Lafayette

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 205 employers in Lafayette, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fostoria DC 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palmer Logistics Warehouse 6 (AmeriPort) 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Interload Forwarding, LLC - Laredo 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tosca - San Antonio 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6284-HL-IN 289 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kimball 289 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cabinetworks Group 288 FTE
STATE-SIZE Snyder's-Lance Inc. IN 290 FTE
CITY-NEAR Subaru of Indiana Automotive, Inc. 6,222 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lafayette Operations 3,025 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wabash Lafayette North 2,452 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arnett Hospital 2,070 FTE
NAT-TCR Robinson Electric Company, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR John Deere Thibodaux 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Killeen Campus (1420) 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilton Buffalo 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 444 Merrick Rd 289 FTE
NAT-SIZE Virginia Marble Manufacturers, Inc. 289 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wheeling 289 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reece Albert 289 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.