Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive a · Florida

Lakeland Fl (Pes)

Lakeland, FL · ~92 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lakeland Fl (Pes) runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive a workplace, earning a grade B.

Lakeland Fl (Pes): 1.3 TCR = 61% of Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive a BLS 2.1 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lakeland Fl (Pes) safety composite

Lakeland Fl (Pes) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lakeland Fl (Pes): 1.1 → 2.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 2.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.84× in 2023

Lakeland Fl (Pes)'s TCR rose 1.0 from 1.1 in 2017 to 2.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Lakeland, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.3 · 61% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #36/122
  • PHOTO Chesterfield Twp, MI
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~92 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chesterfield Twp, MI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Lakeland Fl (Pes) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lakeland Fl (Pes) averages 1.3 TCR (61% of the Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive a BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lakeland Fl (Pes) TCR series: 2017=1.1 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.2 · BLS 2.1

Where Lakeland Fl (Pes) falls in its industry

2,560 Commercial and Industrial Mach establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 122 Commercial and Industrial Mach employers in Florida.

Lakeland Fl (Pes) (92 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Lakeland Fl (Pes)
Lakeland Fl (Pes) (92 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Lakeland Fl (Pes) has more employees than the Commercial and Industrial Machinery and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.2 1.1 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.2 2.2 2 0 0
2018 2.2 2.2 4 0 0
2017 1.1 0.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · FL · Lakeland

2,560 Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive a employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 426 employers in Lakeland, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chesterfield Twp, MI 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Integrated Power Services Miami Service Center 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blanchard Machinery 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dealership - Bakersfield 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanway Farms LLC 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE CLASSIE GROWERS 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE MDP Technology Center South 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE W Dade Svc Cntr & Strm 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeland Regional Medical Center 5,518 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeland Distribution 2,927 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clinic 1,651 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - KLAL 1,210 FTE
NAT-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Southern Atlantic : SVC-ColumbiaSC-USA 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : MFG-Clarksville, TN-USA 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Southeast : SVC-Chattanooga TN-USA 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Occasions-Warehouse 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Parts Authority Fresno 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Southeast : SVC-Nashville TN-USA 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Chi St Lukes the Woodlands 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Macon Marriott City Center 92 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.