Physical therapy offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Michigan

Lakeland Rehab - Niles YMCA

Niles, MI · ~25 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lakeland Rehab - Niles YMCA runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Physical therapy offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade A.

Lakeland Rehab - Niles YMCA: 1.1 TCR = 29% of Physical therapy offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lakeland Rehab - Niles YMCA safety composite

Lakeland Rehab - Niles YMCA scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2016→2020

Lakeland Rehab - Niles YMCA injury rate improved

Lakeland Rehab - Niles YMCA's TCR fell 5.5 from 5.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.5 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621340 · Niles, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 29% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/29
  • PHOTO Farmington Hills Tre…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Farmington Hills Treatment Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Lakeland Rehab - Niles YMCA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lakeland Rehab - Niles YMCA averages 1.1 TCR (29% of the Physical therapy offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lakeland Rehab - Niles YMCA TCR series: 2016=5.5 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Lakeland Rehab - Niles YMCA falls in its industry

220 Physical therapy offices (e.g. establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 29 Physical therapy offices (e.g. employers in Michigan.

Lakeland Rehab - Niles YMCA (25 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Lakeland Rehab - Niles YMCA
Lakeland Rehab - Niles YMCA (25 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Lakeland Rehab - Niles YMCA has fewer employees than the Physical therapy offices (e.g., centers, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 5.5 5.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621340 · MI · Niles

220 Physical therapy offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 68 employers in Niles, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Farmington Hills Treatment Center 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Theradynamics Rehab Management LLC 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CGH Locust St. Center 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wound & Hyperbaric Center & Outpatient Rehab 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hazel Park 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bayside Best Beans LLC. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-County Electric- Blanchard 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wastewater Treatment Plant 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeland Hospital Niles 420 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2010 377 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeland Hospital - Niles 331 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2010 331 FTE
NAT-TCR Houston Main Office 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0060 SMITHFIELD 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Yamada Paint Contracting, Inc. dba GW Construction 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR San Joaquin County Treasurer-Tax Collector/Revenue Recovery 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Croell Inc. - Sheridan 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dougherty Brothers 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE CST Organic Recycling 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arrow Exterminators Fayetteville 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.