Asbestos abatement services · Maine

Lakeside Concrete Cutting Inc.

Newport, ME · ~36 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lakeside Concrete Cutting Inc. runs at 398% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Asbestos abatement services workplace, earning a grade F.

Lakeside Concrete Cutting Inc.: 10.3 TCR = 398% of Asbestos abatement services BLS 2.6 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lakeside Concrete Cutting Inc. safety composite

Lakeside Concrete Cutting Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−23.0

2016→2024

Lakeside Concrete Cutting Inc. injury rate improved

Lakeside Concrete Cutting Inc.'s TCR fell 23.0 from 26.6 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 56.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=26.6 · 2017=56.1 · 2018=15.0 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=7.5 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562910 · Newport, ME ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 398% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO Pacific States Sukut…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pacific States Sukut P31 Joint Venture (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maine employers → · Look up another →

Lakeside Concrete Cutting Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lakeside Concrete Cutting Inc. averages 10.3 TCR (398% of the Asbestos abatement services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lakeside Concrete Cutting Inc. TCR series: 2016=26.6 · 2017=56.1 · 2018=15 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=7.5 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 2.6

Where Lakeside Concrete Cutting Inc. falls in its industry

672 Asbestos abatement services establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maine alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Asbestos abatement services employers in Maine.

Lakeside Concrete Cutting Inc. (36 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lakeside Concrete Cutting Inc.
Lakeside Concrete Cutting Inc. (36 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8

Lakeside Concrete Cutting Inc. has fewer employees than the Asbestos abatement services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2023 4.1 4.1 2 0 0
2022 5.8 5.8 3 0 0
2021 7.5 7.5 4 0 0
2020 9.8 9.8 3 0 0
2018 15.0 11.3 4 0 0
2017 56.1 49.9 9 0 0
2016 26.6 26.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562910 · ME · Newport

672 Asbestos abatement services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,397 rated employers in Maine with headcount on file · 10 employers in Newport, ME · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pacific States Sukut P31 Joint Venture 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Daniels Sharpsmart Inc - Easton 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Abatement Contractors of Montana, LLC 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Daniels Sharpsmart Inc - Baltimore 10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE CMP - North Augusta Service Center 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dean & Allyn, Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Titan Mechanical Inc 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE PRC Industrial Supply 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vic Firth Company 137 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08443 - Store # 8443 Newport 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8443 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Newport Industrial Fabrication 44 FTE
NAT-TCR King Fuji Ranch Inc 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 0195 - Long Beach Bellflower 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Varsity Plumbing and Heating, Inc. 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Social Vocational Services 265 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vanalt Electrical Construction 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Precast Specialties Corp 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE U S Glass Inc 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bob Breeding General Contractors, LLC 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.