Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · California

Lakeside Park

Oakland, CA · ~78 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lakeside Park runs at 313% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Lakeside Park: 11.9 TCR = 313% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lakeside Park safety composite

Lakeside Park scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lakeside Park: 8.0 → 11.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 27.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.33× in 2024

Lakeside Park's TCR rose 3.7 from 8.0 in 2016 to 11.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 27.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Oakland, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.9 · 313% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #145/216
  • PHOTO Walnut Creek Assiste…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Walnut Creek Assisted Living & Memory Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Lakeside Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lakeside Park averages 11.9 TCR (313% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lakeside Park TCR series: 2016=8 · 2017=13.9 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=9.7 · 2020=27.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=7.9 · 2023=22.9 · 2024=11.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Lakeside Park falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #145 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Lakeside Park (78 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lakeside Park
Lakeside Park (78 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Lakeside Park has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.7 3.9 6 0 0
2023 22.9 22.9 3 10 0
2022 7.9 5.9 4 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 27.8 27.8 4 13 0
2019 9.7 9.7 7 0 0
2018 5.4 5.4 4 0 0
2017 13.9 9.9 7 0 0
2016 8.0 8.0 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · Oakland

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 458 employers in Oakland, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Walnut Creek Assisted Living & Memory Care 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morningside House of Satyr Hill 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orchard pointe Arrowhead 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Methodist Communities - Collingswood 11.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE California Endive Farms 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE VF - Napa 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Russell Harris Farms 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hadley Date Gardens, Inc. 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oakland Unified School District 4,473 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02120301 4,408 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02620301 3,210 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02620301 2,922 FTE
NAT-TCR A-1 Steel Inc. 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Cast Specialties, Inc. 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hamilton Manor Nursing Home 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR US Cargo-Cleveland 11.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Keefe Jacksonville 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE County Clerk 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Resolute Tissue Sanford 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rothenbuhler Cheesemakers, Inc. 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.