Retirement communities, continuing care · Nebraska

Lakeside Village

Omaha, NE · ~125 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lakeside Village runs at 103% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade C.

Lakeside Village: 3.9 TCR = 103% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lakeside Village safety composite

Lakeside Village scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lakeside Village: 1.3 → 5.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 7.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.16× in 2024

Lakeside Village's TCR rose 4.4 from 1.3 in 2016 to 5.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Omaha, NE ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 103% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #17/56
  • PHOTO The Home for the Aged
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~125 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Home for the Aged (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Lakeside Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lakeside Village averages 3.9 TCR (103% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lakeside Village TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=5.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Lakeside Village falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 56 Retirement communities, contin employers in Nebraska.

Lakeside Village (125 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lakeside Village
Lakeside Village (125 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Lakeside Village has more employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.7 4.5 5 0 0
2023 4.5 4.5 4 0 0
2022 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2021 7.3 7.3 6 0 0
2020 3.5 1.1 3 0 0
2019 4.8 4.8 4 0 0
2018 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2017 4.8 2.4 4 0 0
2016 1.3 1.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NE · Omaha

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 1,135 employers in Omaha, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Home for the Aged 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Brittany Point Estates 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00333-First Community Village 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Christian Care Management Inc 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Norland International Inc./American Beer Equipmen 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valley NE - Main Campus - Tubing 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Christensen Lumber 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE River City Nursing and Rehabilitation 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drivers Management LLC/Over the Road Drivers 9,373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nebraska Medicine 8,728 FTE
CITY-NEAR FUSION MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC 2,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR 61830001 METHODIST HOSPITAL 2,861 FTE
NAT-TCR RHP MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, INC dba; RAY HEATING PRODUCTS INC. 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Colepak Inc 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #0018 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Doraville 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Waste Industries Fayetteville 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Town of Essex 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dunnet Bay Main 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE King Arthur Baking Co., Inc. - Gen Warehouse & Storage (Avalon) 125 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.