Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Colorado

Lakeview Commons

Loveland, CO · ~48 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lakeview Commons runs at 310% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Lakeview Commons: 11.8 TCR = 310% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lakeview Commons safety composite

Lakeview Commons scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 31.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lakeview Commons: 6.8 → 31.9 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 86.8 TCR · DART/TCR 2.71× in 2024

Lakeview Commons's TCR rose 25.1 from 6.8 in 2016 to 31.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 86.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Loveland, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.8 · 310% of ind

  • DART 31.9 DART
  • RANK #109/140
  • PHOTO Brookdale Geary Street
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Geary Street (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Lakeview Commons in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lakeview Commons averages 11.8 TCR (310% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lakeview Commons TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=3 · 2022=33 · 2023=86.8 · 2024=31.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Lakeview Commons falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #109 safest of 140 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Colorado.

Lakeview Commons (48 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Lakeview Commons
Lakeview Commons (48 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Lakeview Commons has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 31.9 31.9 2 9 0
2023 86.8 86.8 0 27 0
2022 33.0 33.0 0 10 0
2021 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2020 6.4 6.4 2 0 0
2019 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2018 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2017 6.7 6.7 2 0 0
2016 6.8 3.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CO · Loveland

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 188 employers in Loveland, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Geary Street 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Chapman House 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedars of Liberty 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Woods of Centralia 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farm Technology Corporation Fram 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rangely Field Office 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Summit Operations Center 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brighton 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical Center of the Rockies 1,357 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hach Company 1,291 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hach Loveland 1,281 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6019 937 FTE
NAT-TCR AHG Apple Valley Medical Center 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ware Butler Building Supply - Waterville 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Applequist Mfg, Inc. 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Valley Pallet - Salinas 11.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nmros - Roswell Center 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Royster's Machine Shop LLC 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nyloc - Lockport Center 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nmclo - Clovis Center 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.