Motor Freight Transportation And Warehousing · California

Lam Research -Marathon. (SMRU72889)

Livermore, CA · ~116 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lam Research -Marathon. (SMRU72889) runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Motor Freight Transportation And Warehousing workplace, earning a grade B.

Lam Research -Marathon. (SMRU72889): 3.0 TCR = 52% of Motor Freight Transportation And Warehousing BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lam Research -Marathon. (SMRU72889) safety composite

Lam Research -Marathon. (SMRU72889) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2021→2022

Lam Research -Marathon. (SMRU72889) injury rate improved

Lam Research -Marathon. (SMRU72889)'s TCR fell 3.4 from 4.7 in 2021 to 1.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=4.7 · 2022=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Livermore, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 52% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #399/1131
  • PHOTO Clorox Lathrop David…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~116 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clorox Lathrop David Pepe (MRU1037) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Lam Research -Marathon. (SMRU72889) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lam Research -Marathon. (SMRU72889) averages 3.0 TCR (52% of the Motor Freight Transportation And Warehousing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Lam Research -Marathon. (SMRU72889) TCR series: 2021=4.7 · 2022=1.3 · BLS 5.8

Where Lam Research -Marathon. (SMRU72889) falls in its industry

9,477 Motor Freight Transportation A establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #399 safest of 1131 Motor Freight Transportation A employers in California.

Lam Research -Marathon. (SMRU72889) (116 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lam Research -Marathon. (SMRU72889)
Lam Research -Marathon. (SMRU72889) (116 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Lam Research -Marathon. (SMRU72889) has more employees than the Motor Freight Transportation And Warehou median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.3 0.6 2 0 0
2021 4.7 4.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Livermore

9,477 Motor Freight Transportation And Warehousing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 296 employers in Livermore, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clorox Lathrop David Pepe (MRU1037) 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PODS Pinellas Park, FL 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ankeny DC 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Distribution Centers LLC-522 South Enterprise Blvd. 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Trader Joe's 0174 San Carlos 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vibiana Events 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE RDC - 49 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE 054120-LBC-NORTH CARRIER ANX 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Retail Merchandising Solutions, LLC 4,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 577 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gillig LLC 940 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fat Chance Entertainment 917 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Carthage College 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR MicroStar Quality Services - Eagle Pass 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbia Mo (Quaker) 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Aurora West Dining 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE West Las Vegas 39080 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Black Diamond-McHenry 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE IMC Life Flight Operations 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tony's Finer Foods-1667 116 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.