Lamb carcasses, half carcasses, primal and sub-primal cuts, produced in slaughtering plants · Michigan

Lamb & Veal, Maintenance

Detroit, MI · ~74 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lamb & Veal, Maintenance runs at 352% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Lamb carcasses, half carcasses, primal and sub-primal cuts, produced in slaughtering plants workplace, earning a grade F.

Lamb & Veal, Maintenance: 11.6 TCR = 352% of Lamb carcasses, half carcasses, primal and sub-primal cuts, produced in slaughtering plants BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lamb & Veal, Maintenance safety composite

Lamb & Veal, Maintenance scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2020→2024

Lamb & Veal, Maintenance injury rate improved

Lamb & Veal, Maintenance's TCR fell 1.0 from 10.7 in 2020 to 9.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 13.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=10.7 · 2021=12.8 · 2023=13.3 · 2024=9.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311611 · Detroit, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.6 · 352% of ind

  • DART 6.8 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO Marcho Farms, Inc
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Marcho Farms, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Lamb & Veal, Maintenance in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lamb & Veal, Maintenance averages 11.6 TCR (352% of the Lamb carcasses, half carcasses, primal and sub-primal cuts, produced in slaughtering plants BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lamb & Veal, Maintenance TCR series: 2020=10.7 · 2021=12.8 · 2023=13.3 · 2024=9.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Lamb & Veal, Maintenance falls in its industry

212 Lamb carcasses, half carcasses establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Lamb carcasses, half carcasses employers in Michigan.

Lamb & Veal, Maintenance (74 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 297 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Lamb & Veal, Maintenance
Lamb & Veal, Maintenance (74 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 297 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Lamb & Veal, Maintenance has fewer employees than the Lamb carcasses, half carcasses, primal a median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.7 6.8 10 0 0
2023 13.3 10.0 12 0 0
2021 12.8 5.7 9 0 0
2020 10.7 7.1 8 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311611 · MI · Detroit

212 Lamb carcasses, half carcasses, primal and sub-primal cuts, produced in slaughtering plants employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 673 employers in Detroit, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Marcho Farms, Inc 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Valley Meat Company 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR White Castle System, Inc. - Lebanon Meat Plant 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pioneer Meats, Inc. 11.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Adrian SC 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Grand Rapids-Environmental Protection Services Division 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Detroit Office 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Works-Streets and Sanitation 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Hospital 8,838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Detroit Campus 8,632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - DTW 6,640 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Corporation 5,241 FTE
NAT-TCR ACES 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR El Dorado Union High School District 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Madisonville - Sanitation 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR LA Summa Ave, LLC 11.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bilstein Cold Rolled Steel LLP 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Tech 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Merrill Distributing Inc 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wickshire Tamarac 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.