Laminating purchased textiles · Massachusetts

Laminating Coating Technologies, Inc.

Monson, MA · ~58 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Laminating Coating Technologies, Inc. runs at 156% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Laminating purchased textiles workplace, earning a grade D.

Laminating Coating Technologies, Inc.: 5.2 TCR = 156% of Laminating purchased textiles BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Laminating Coating Technologies, Inc. safety composite

Laminating Coating Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Laminating Coating Technologies, Inc.: 3.5 → 5.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 7.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.36× in 2020

Laminating Coating Technologies, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.1 from 3.5 in 2016 to 5.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 313320 · Monson, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 156% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #6/10
  • PHOTO Indiana Coated Fabrics
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Indiana Coated Fabrics (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Laminating Coating Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Laminating Coating Technologies, Inc. averages 5.2 TCR (156% of the Laminating purchased textiles BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Laminating Coating Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.5 · 2017=5 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=7 · 2020=5.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Laminating Coating Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

79 Laminating purchased textiles establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 10 Laminating purchased textiles employers in Massachusetts.

Laminating Coating Technologies, Inc. (58 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Laminating Coating Technologies, Inc.
Laminating Coating Technologies, Inc. (58 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Laminating Coating Technologies, Inc. has fewer employees than the Laminating purchased textiles median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 5.5 1.9 3 0 0
2019 7.0 5.6 5 0 0
2018 4.7 3.1 3 0 0
2017 5.0 3.4 3 0 0
2016 3.5 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

313320 · MA · Monson

79 Laminating purchased textiles employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 5 employers in Monson, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Indiana Coated Fabrics 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spradling Resources 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Majilite 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hayward Road 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE FirstLight Power Resources - Northfield Mountain/NERC 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Liberty Utilities Charles Street 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Somerville Gas 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elkins 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trelleborg Coated Systems US, Inc. 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holistic Industries, Inc 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR MONSON-MA23 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Metals, Inc. 21 FTE
NAT-TCR Metropistas (areas Verdes) 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR OAK 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR DGS Aviation Services : MSO - Missoula 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Fisher Auto Parts - FPRKOH 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Watrous Nursing Center 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Palms at Lake Spivey 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE HellermannTyton- 87th St. 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE MED 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.