Automobile dealers, new only or new and used · Pennsylvania

Lancaster County Motors Subaru

East Petersburg, PA · ~109 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lancaster County Motors Subaru runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Automobile dealers, new only or new and used workplace, earning a grade C.

Lancaster County Motors Subaru: 3.5 TCR = 102% of Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS 3.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lancaster County Motors Subaru safety composite

Lancaster County Motors Subaru scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2016→2019

Lancaster County Motors Subaru injury rate improved

Lancaster County Motors Subaru's TCR fell 5.3 from 6.9 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.9 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 441110 · East Petersburg, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 102% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #69/168
  • PHOTO John Jones Chevrolet…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: John Jones Chevrolet Buick Cadillac of Salem, INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Lancaster County Motors Subaru in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lancaster County Motors Subaru averages 3.5 TCR (102% of the Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lancaster County Motors Subaru TCR series: 2016=6.9 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=1.6 · BLS 3.4

Where Lancaster County Motors Subaru falls in its industry

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only o establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 168 Automobile dealers, new only o employers in Pennsylvania.

Lancaster County Motors Subaru (109 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Lancaster County Motors Subaru
Lancaster County Motors Subaru (109 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Lancaster County Motors Subaru has more employees than the Automobile dealers, new only or new and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.6 0.8 2 0 0
2018 3.2 0.0 3 0 0
2017 2.1 1.1 2 0 0
2016 6.9 5.7 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

441110 · PA · East Petersburg

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only or new and used employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 18 employers in East Petersburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR John Jones Chevrolet Buick Cadillac of Salem, INC 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waukesha-CJD Inc 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kia of Mankato 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR VARSITY LINCOLN INC. 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pittsburgh Operations 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE HRV Conformance Verification Associates, Inc. 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.C. Lee Construction and Supply Company, Inc 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Neshaminy Electrical Contractors, Inc. 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR PALAN - LANCASTER 718 FTE
CITY-NEAR LANCASTER (PALAN) 693 FTE
CITY-NEAR Warfel Construction Company 223 FTE
CITY-NEAR Allen Imports LTD Inc 199 FTE
NAT-TCR Highland City 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Fulfillment Center 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 4113-41131003-R08 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Grace Hospice 20-0112013 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Patio Pools and Spas 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brentwood Terrace Healthcare and Rehab Center 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE QuVa Pharma Bloomsbury 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE 330 - Lawrence-KS 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.