Blades, saw, all types, manufacturing · New York

Lancaster Knives Inc.

Lancaster, NY · ~31 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lancaster Knives Inc. runs at 466% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Blades, saw, all types, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Lancaster Knives Inc.: 15.4 TCR = 466% of Blades, saw, all types, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lancaster Knives Inc. safety composite

Lancaster Knives Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2024

Lancaster Knives Inc. injury rate improved

Lancaster Knives Inc.'s TCR fell 1.7 from 11.6 in 2016 to 9.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 44.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.6 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=23.6 · 2020=11.9 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=44.6 · 2023=9.9 · 2024=9.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332216 · Lancaster, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.4 · 466% of ind

  • DART 9.9 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Jonesville Tool & Ma…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jonesville Tool & Manufacturing, Inc. (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Lancaster Knives Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lancaster Knives Inc. averages 15.4 TCR (466% of the Blades, saw, all types, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lancaster Knives Inc. TCR series: 2016=11.6 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=23.6 · 2020=11.9 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=44.6 · 2023=9.9 · 2024=9.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Lancaster Knives Inc. falls in its industry

174 Blades, saw, all types, manufa establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Blades, saw, all types, manufa employers in New York.

Lancaster Knives Inc. (31 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lancaster Knives Inc.
Lancaster Knives Inc. (31 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Lancaster Knives Inc. has fewer employees than the Blades, saw, all types, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.9 9.9 4 0 0
2023 9.9 0.0 3 1 0
2022 44.6 44.6 9 1 0
2021 5.7 2.9 2 0 0
2020 11.9 11.9 3 0 0
2019 23.6 23.6 6 0 0
2018 5.7 5.7 2 0 0
2016 11.6 11.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332216 · NY · Lancaster

174 Blades, saw, all types, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 83 employers in Lancaster, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jonesville Tool & Manufacturing, Inc. 15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seymour Manufacturing Co., Inc. 16.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dynamic Dies Pitt 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The L.S. Starrett Company 13.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eldred Brothers / Main Farm 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fox Fruit Farms LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE ASC Kirkwood 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES : OM - New Athens 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : BUF5 1,188 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BUF5 1,074 FTE
CITY-NEAR Erie Logistics 713 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BUF9 665 FTE
NAT-TCR Aurora Civic Center Authority 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR D8 Troy Yard 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilson Ag 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Orange Products, Inc. 15.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Homewood Suites by Hilton - Palo Alto 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Commonwealth 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Muskegon Sales Branch 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Daley Electric, LLC 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.