Tobacco stemming and redrying · Pennsylvania

Lancaster Leaf Tobacco Company, Inc.

Lancaster, PA · ~83 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lancaster Leaf Tobacco Company, Inc. runs at 443% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Tobacco stemming and redrying workplace, earning a grade F.

Lancaster Leaf Tobacco Company, Inc.: 14.6 TCR = 443% of Tobacco stemming and redrying BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lancaster Leaf Tobacco Company, Inc. safety composite

Lancaster Leaf Tobacco Company, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2018→2024

Lancaster Leaf Tobacco Company, Inc. injury rate improved

Lancaster Leaf Tobacco Company, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.7 from 13.8 in 2018 to 9.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 24.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=13.8 · 2020=11.0 · 2021=24.3 · 2022=21.3 · 2023=8.3 · 2024=9.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 312230 · Lancaster, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.6 · 443% of ind

  • DART 8.1 DART
  • RANK #5/6
  • PHOTO Lancaster Leaf Tobac…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 50 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lancaster Leaf Tobacco Company, Inc. - Storage (0.7 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Lancaster Leaf Tobacco Company, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lancaster Leaf Tobacco Company, Inc. averages 14.6 TCR (443% of the Tobacco stemming and redrying BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lancaster Leaf Tobacco Company, Inc. TCR series: 2018=13.8 · 2020=11 · 2021=24.3 · 2022=21.3 · 2023=8.3 · 2024=9.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Lancaster Leaf Tobacco Company, Inc. falls in its industry

53 Tobacco stemming and redrying establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 6 Tobacco stemming and redrying employers in Pennsylvania.

Lancaster Leaf Tobacco Company, Inc. (83 employees, TCR 14.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 153 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lancaster Leaf Tobacco Company, Inc.
Lancaster Leaf Tobacco Company, Inc. (83 employees, TCR 14.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 153 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Lancaster Leaf Tobacco Company, Inc. has fewer employees than the Tobacco stemming and redrying median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.1 8.1 8 1 0
2023 8.3 5.9 5 2 0
2022 21.3 15.0 12 5 0
2021 24.3 14.8 10 8 0
2020 11.0 3.7 5 4 0
2018 13.8 13.8 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

312230 · PA · Lancaster

53 Tobacco stemming and redrying employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 450 employers in Lancaster, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lancaster Leaf Tobacco Company, Inc. - Storage 15.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nuway Tobacco 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shepherdsville 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mr Juice LLC 10.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE MD Basciani & Sons, Inc. 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Hillis Group, pLLC 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, Inc - Ford City 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Health, LGH Hospital 7,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR LGHealth 7,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Hospital 6,528 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Medical Group 1,436 FTE
NAT-TCR The Ritz Carlton Dove Mountain 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ILC029 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Auburn Retail 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Middletown - Police Department 14.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Clark Roofing Co. 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Santa Maria Ca 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Belton, MO DC 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Las Vegas Tropicana 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.