Hospitals, general medical and surgical · Ohio

Landerbrook Office & Endoscopy Center

Mayfield Heights, OH · ~37 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Landerbrook Office & Endoscopy Center runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade A.

Landerbrook Office & Endoscopy Center: 1.1 TCR = 14% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 7.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Landerbrook Office & Endoscopy Center safety composite

Landerbrook Office & Endoscopy Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2016→2019

Landerbrook Office & Endoscopy Center injury rate improved

Landerbrook Office & Endoscopy Center's TCR fell 3.2 from 3.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.2 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.2 · 2017=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Mayfield Heights, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #41/352
  • PHOTO Penn Highlands Tyron…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Penn Highlands Tyrone Hospital (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Landerbrook Office & Endoscopy Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Landerbrook Office & Endoscopy Center averages 1.1 TCR (14% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Landerbrook Office & Endoscopy Center TCR series: 2016=3.2 · 2017=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 7.5

Where Landerbrook Office & Endoscopy Center falls in its industry

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 352 Hospitals, general medical and employers in Ohio.

Landerbrook Office & Endoscopy Center (37 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Landerbrook Office & Endoscopy Center
Landerbrook Office & Endoscopy Center (37 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Landerbrook Office & Endoscopy Center has fewer employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · OH · Mayfield Heights

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 22 employers in Mayfield Heights, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Penn Highlands Tyrone Hospital 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Neuro Surgery/Spine 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CMH Medication Assisted Treatment 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Columbia Memorial Palliative Care 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Biosecurity Building 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbus SW Svc Ctr 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lead Building Company LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unified Restoration Systems, LLC 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockwell Automation- Mayfield Heights OH (MAY) 1,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR Materion - Mayfield 337 FTE
CITY-NEAR TMW Systems Mayfield Heights 313 FTE
CITY-NEAR State Chemical 255 FTE
NAT-TCR MARINEMAX East INC-JAC 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 3505-ADC Main Campus 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Salt Lake City Processing 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR IL_Carol Stream_815 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Moser's Foods #2 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kimberlina Shop 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE WCA Sacramento 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Disposal - Mobile Hauling 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.