Automobile dealers, new only or new and used · Missouri

Landers Chevrolet Cadillac of Joplin

Joplin, MO · ~51 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Landers Chevrolet Cadillac of Joplin runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Automobile dealers, new only or new and used workplace, earning a grade A.

Landers Chevrolet Cadillac of Joplin: 0.5 TCR = 14% of Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS 3.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Landers Chevrolet Cadillac of Joplin safety composite

Landers Chevrolet Cadillac of Joplin scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2019→2022

Landers Chevrolet Cadillac of Joplin injury rate improved

Landers Chevrolet Cadillac of Joplin's TCR fell 1.9 from 1.9 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 441110 · Joplin, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/48
  • PHOTO MBC Metairie LLC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MBC Metairie LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Landers Chevrolet Cadillac of Joplin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Landers Chevrolet Cadillac of Joplin averages 0.5 TCR (14% of the Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Landers Chevrolet Cadillac of Joplin TCR series: 2019=1.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.4

Where Landers Chevrolet Cadillac of Joplin falls in its industry

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only o establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 48 Automobile dealers, new only o employers in Missouri.

Landers Chevrolet Cadillac of Joplin (51 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Landers Chevrolet Cadillac of Joplin
Landers Chevrolet Cadillac of Joplin (51 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Landers Chevrolet Cadillac of Joplin has fewer employees than the Automobile dealers, new only or new and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.9 1.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

441110 · MO · Joplin

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only or new and used employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 203 employers in Joplin, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MBC Metairie LLC 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jenkins Hyundai of Jacksonville 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sewell Corporate Office 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR David Taylor Chrysler 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE La Belle Dairy, LLC 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southwest Electric Cooperative (headquarters) 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate & Shop 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE HR Quadri Contractors, LLC 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Freeman Health System 3,718 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL JOPLIN 1,561 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marmic Fire & Safety Company Inc. 875 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jasper Products, LLC 782 FTE
NAT-TCR Kimberly Clark Corp. Corinth Professional 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR ISE-Mag Tech 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SF - 1563 Mission St, SF Admin 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Alder 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE LifeServices - Westlake Woods 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cooperstown Medical Center 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trans Colorado Concrete 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE 161 The Colony 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.