Removal of recyclable materials from a waste stream · Wisconsin

Landfill Reduction and Recycling Dane County

Madison, WI · ~22 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Landfill Reduction and Recycling Dane County runs at 332% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Removal of recyclable materials from a waste stream workplace, earning a grade F.

Landfill Reduction and Recycling Dane County: 8.6 TCR = 332% of Removal of recyclable materials from a waste stream BLS 2.6 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Landfill Reduction and Recycling Dane County safety composite

Landfill Reduction and Recycling Dane County scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Landfill Reduction and Recycling Dane County: 8.4 → 8.9 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 8.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2017

Landfill Reduction and Recycling Dane County's TCR rose 0.4 from 8.4 in 2016 to 8.9 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562920 · Madison, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.6 · 332% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/22
  • PHOTO Western NY BICS
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Western NY BICS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Landfill Reduction and Recycling Dane County in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Landfill Reduction and Recycling Dane County averages 8.6 TCR (332% of the Removal of recyclable materials from a waste stream BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Landfill Reduction and Recycling Dane County TCR series: 2016=8.4 · 2017=8.9 · BLS 2.6

Where Landfill Reduction and Recycling Dane County falls in its industry

422 Removal of recyclable material establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 22 Removal of recyclable material employers in Wisconsin.

Landfill Reduction and Recycling Dane County (22 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Landfill Reduction and Recycling Dane County
Landfill Reduction and Recycling Dane County (22 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Landfill Reduction and Recycling Dane County has fewer employees than the Removal of recyclable materials from a w median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 8.9 0.0 0 2 0
2016 8.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562920 · WI · Madison

422 Removal of recyclable materials from a waste stream employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 577 employers in Madison, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Western NY BICS 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR DTG Enterprises, Inc. - Renton 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MRF Oakland Wood 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dynamic Onalaska Campus 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE URUS Production Shawano Stony Hill 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weston 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jackson Electric Cooperative 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Menomonie Service Center 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital - Madison 2,401 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meriter Hospital 2,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR EatStreet 1,659 FTE
CITY-NEAR TDS - Junction Road (All Employees) 1,302 FTE
NAT-TCR Kingston (Nykin) 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Newark Group - Caraustar York 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR DHS of Blount County, LLC 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Feedmill 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Open Gates FTD/ARTI 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE LKC CBTC Flushing 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0785 - Alexander City, Al 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0768 - Palmdale, Ca 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.