Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

Landing at Watermere Frisco

Frisco, TX · ~76 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Landing at Watermere Frisco runs at 198% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Landing at Watermere Frisco: 7.5 TCR = 198% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Landing at Watermere Frisco safety composite

Landing at Watermere Frisco scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.8

2017→2024

Landing at Watermere Frisco injury rate improved

Landing at Watermere Frisco's TCR fell 10.8 from 13.8 in 2017 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 13.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=13.8 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=9.6 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=8.9 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Frisco, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.5 · 198% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #276/470
  • PHOTO Villas of Holly Broo…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Villas of Holly Brook - Washington (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Landing at Watermere Frisco in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Landing at Watermere Frisco averages 7.5 TCR (198% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Landing at Watermere Frisco TCR series: 2017=13.8 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=9.6 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=8.9 · 2024=3 · BLS 3.8

Where Landing at Watermere Frisco falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #276 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Landing at Watermere Frisco (76 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Landing at Watermere Frisco
Landing at Watermere Frisco (76 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Landing at Watermere Frisco has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2023 8.9 8.9 6 0 0
2022 4.5 4.5 3 0 0
2021 6.4 3.2 4 0 0
2020 5.9 5.9 7 0 0
2019 9.6 6.9 7 0 0
2018 8.3 6.2 4 0 0
2017 13.8 13.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · Frisco

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 174 employers in Frisco, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Villas of Holly Brook - Washington 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63120 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63170 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern Manor Living Center LLC Fayetteville 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE TX-NSF-TEXAS 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Birdsong Peanuts 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1550 TECH CENTRE PKWY ARLINGTON TX 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-State Ventures, LLC dba Carefree Homes 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-238 8,351 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-RRD 2,767 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4016-18236000 1,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sinacola 845 FTE
NAT-TCR CenterLight Healthcare - Ridgewood 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Price Rite Store 305 New Britain 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mackey Lumber Co., Inc 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Riverside 295 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE National Ticket Company 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stockton - BNSF 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keeley & Sons, Inc. 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Miller Construction Company 76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.