Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Georgia

Landings of Gainesville

Gainesville, GA · ~29 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
28.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Landings of Gainesville runs at 741% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Landings of Gainesville: 28.2 TCR = 741% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Landings of Gainesville safety composite

Landings of Gainesville scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 28.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Landings of Gainesville: 23.7 → 39.8 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 39.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.35× in 2021

Landings of Gainesville's TCR rose 16.1 from 23.7 in 2018 to 39.8 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Gainesville, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 28.2 · 741% of ind

  • DART 9.9 DART
  • RANK #205/205
  • PHOTO The Reserve at Thous…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Reserve at Thousand Oaks (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Landings of Gainesville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Landings of Gainesville averages 28.2 TCR (741% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Landings of Gainesville TCR series: 2018=23.7 · 2019=17 · 2020=32.3 · 2021=39.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Landings of Gainesville falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #205 safest of 205 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Georgia.

Landings of Gainesville (29 employees, TCR 28.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Landings of Gainesville
Landings of Gainesville (29 employees, TCR 28.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Landings of Gainesville has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 39.8 9.9 7 1 0
2020 32.3 4.6 7 0 0
2019 17.0 3.4 5 0 0
2018 23.7 0.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · GA · Gainesville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 306 employers in Gainesville, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Reserve at Thousand Oaks 28.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Farmington Station Assisted Living Residence 28.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morada Grand Prairie 28.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Annette Lodge 28.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Valdosta TMC - 805 W. Savannah Ave. Valdosta, GA 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metro South - 119 Smith Street Jonesboro 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tifton Operating - 1010 Bruce Lane Tifton, GA 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bainbridge Operating - 308 Airport Rd. Bainbridge, GA 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Inc. 5,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kubota Manufacturing of America Corporation 1,863 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poultry Processing 1,546 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mar-Jac Poultry, Inc Processing Plant 1,190 FTE
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0568 Ithaca 28.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1776 28.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Linkville Roofing and Siding Inc 28.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Running Y 28.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Clements Nut Company 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2007-Ucpmc-Niagara St Icf 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE BrandSafway Services, LLC - Minneapolis Branch 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plymouth FS (SSS, CSS) 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.