Homes for the elderly without nursing care · Mississippi

Landmark Community

Booneville, MS · ~31 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Landmark Community runs at 150% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Homes for the elderly without nursing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Landmark Community: 5.7 TCR = 150% of Homes for the elderly without nursing care BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Landmark Community safety composite

Landmark Community scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.6

2019→2024

Landmark Community injury rate improved

Landmark Community's TCR fell 8.6 from 8.6 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 25.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=8.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=25.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Booneville, MS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 150% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/29
  • PHOTO Brookdale Oak Park
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Oak Park (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Landmark Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Landmark Community averages 5.7 TCR (150% of the Homes for the elderly without nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Landmark Community TCR series: 2019=8.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=25.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Landmark Community falls in its industry

6,510 Homes for the elderly without establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 29 Homes for the elderly without employers in Mississippi.

Landmark Community (31 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Landmark Community
Landmark Community (31 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Landmark Community has fewer employees than the Homes for the elderly without nursing ca median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 25.6 25.6 0 4 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 8.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MS · Booneville

6,510 Homes for the elderly without nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 26 employers in Booneville, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Oak Park 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakewood Senior Living,Drums ,LLC d/b/a/ Fritzingertown Senior Living Commuity 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Oakbridge 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR HCP Coconut Creek FL OpCo, LLC 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Brussel's Bonsai Nursery LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newton Hatchery (MLO) 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mill Creek Gin Inc. 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hattiesburg Management Office 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACCO Brands - Booneville 501 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Memorial Hospital 386 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plumrose, USA 367 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 114 222 FTE
NAT-TCR Spectrum Underground, Inc. 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Eakle Vineyard Management LLC 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Holmes Regional Medical Center 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Tucson AZ FXFE-TUC 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hercules Machinery Corporation 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cassone Truck & Equipment Sales, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keystone Quality Transport Company - Chesco Base 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Freese Management LLC 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.