HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors · Florida

Lapin Sheet Metal Co. Inc

Orlando, FL · ~57 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lapin Sheet Metal Co. Inc runs at 156% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Lapin Sheet Metal Co. Inc: 4.4 TCR = 156% of HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lapin Sheet Metal Co. Inc safety composite

Lapin Sheet Metal Co. Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.5

2016→2022

Lapin Sheet Metal Co. Inc injury rate improved

Lapin Sheet Metal Co. Inc's TCR fell 11.5 from 11.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 11.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.5 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=8.7 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Orlando, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 156% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #228/425
  • PHOTO BEST PLUMBING, LLC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BEST PLUMBING, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Lapin Sheet Metal Co. Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lapin Sheet Metal Co. Inc averages 4.4 TCR (156% of the HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lapin Sheet Metal Co. Inc TCR series: 2016=11.5 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=8.7 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Lapin Sheet Metal Co. Inc falls in its industry

5,793 HVAC (heating, ventilation and establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #228 safest of 425 HVAC (heating, ventilation and employers in Florida.

Lapin Sheet Metal Co. Inc (57 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lapin Sheet Metal Co. Inc
Lapin Sheet Metal Co. Inc (57 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Lapin Sheet Metal Co. Inc has fewer employees than the HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-condi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.8 1.9 2 0 0
2019 4.6 1.6 3 0 0
2018 8.7 2.5 7 0 0
2017 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2016 11.5 6.5 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · FL · Orlando

5,793 HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,997 employers in Orlando, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BEST PLUMBING, LLC 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR RAMSETT MECHANICAL 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ideal Consolidated, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hiller Salt Lake City 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Quincy, FL Complex 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Hillsborough Service Area 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE DSC South Campus 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southeast Orlando Operations Center 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Orlando Resort 20,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Parks and Resorts : UO 13,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO 11,412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Orlando 10,318 FTE
NAT-TCR Phillips-Medisize, LLC - Automotive Facility 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ME Global - Tempe 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Technimark LLC - WELLMARK 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Parsec Austell 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE HG846 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilton Garden Inn Springfield 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG293 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG266 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.