General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) · Texas

Laredo Terminal

Laredo, TX · ~222 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Laredo Terminal runs at 165% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade D.

Laredo Terminal: 7.4 TCR = 165% of General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Laredo Terminal safety composite

Laredo Terminal scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2024

Laredo Terminal injury rate improved

Laredo Terminal's TCR fell 0.4 from 1.5 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 30.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.5 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=30.5 · 2019=27.3 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Laredo, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.4 · 165% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #276/297
  • PHOTO Pottsville PA Drivers
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 72 inj
  • SIZE ~222 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pottsville PA Drivers (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Laredo Terminal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Laredo Terminal averages 7.4 TCR (165% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Laredo Terminal TCR series: 2016=1.5 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=30.5 · 2019=27.3 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1 · BLS 4.5

Where Laredo Terminal falls in its industry

3,252 General freight trucking, long establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #276 safest of 297 General freight trucking, long employers in Texas.

Laredo Terminal (222 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Laredo Terminal
Laredo Terminal (222 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Laredo Terminal has more employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 0.7 3 0 0
2023 1.6 0.3 5 0 0
2022 1.5 0.6 5 0 0
2021 1.4 1.1 5 0 0
2020 1.2 0.5 13 0 0
2019 27.3 17.3 22 0 0
2018 30.5 12.2 15 0 0
2017 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2016 1.5 1.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · TX · Laredo

3,252 General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 245 employers in Laredo, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pottsville PA Drivers 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MLS-NC - MLS New Castle 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CANTON DNS 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Duane Kottke Trucking Corp 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Run Energy, LP 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE EC/DC CP12 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allen Butler Construction Inc 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nestle Waters- Dallas 222 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - Laredo 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Laredo 1,775 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-21080000-21080 748 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-62 672 FTE
NAT-TCR Glendale 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pottsville PA Drivers 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Meter Services 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Muncy Valley Hospital 7.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Good Earth Mill Valley 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clay County - Family Service Center 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Barco Uniforms, Inc. 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forest Park, GA - Ruskin Dr 222 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.