Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation · Nevada

LAS Las Vegas Airport

Las Vegas, NV · ~85 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

LAS Las Vegas Airport runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade B.

LAS Las Vegas Airport: 3.3 TCR = 74% of Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

LAS Las Vegas Airport safety composite

LAS Las Vegas Airport scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2024

LAS Las Vegas Airport injury rate improved

LAS Las Vegas Airport's TCR fell 0.6 from 2.9 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.9 · 2017=7.4 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=4.0 · 2023=8.6 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · Las Vegas, NV AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.3 · 74% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #8/32
  • PHOTO Burlingame Alaska Mgmt
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Burlingame Alaska Mgmt (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nevada employers → · Look up another →

LAS Las Vegas Airport in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows LAS Las Vegas Airport averages 3.3 TCR (74% of the Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

LAS Las Vegas Airport TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2017=7.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=4 · 2023=8.6 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 4.5

Where LAS Las Vegas Airport falls in its industry

1,568 Scheduled Passenger Air Transp establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nevada alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 32 Scheduled Passenger Air Transp employers in Nevada.

LAS Las Vegas Airport (85 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate LAS Las Vegas Airport
LAS Las Vegas Airport (85 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

LAS Las Vegas Airport has fewer employees than the Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2023 8.6 8.6 4 0 0
2022 4.0 0.0 2 0 0
2021 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2020 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 7.4 2.5 5 1 0
2016 2.9 1.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · NV · Las Vegas

1,568 Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,574 rated employers in Nevada with headcount on file · 2,247 employers in Las Vegas, NV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Burlingame Alaska Mgmt 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mesa Airlines, Inc. - TX 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2073-SW-20730088-CS 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4795-EA-ORD-CHICAGO - OHARE-EAGLE TECH OPS 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Electrical Services Inc. 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Builders Inc 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE VT Construction, Inc 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE JCORD LLC. Office 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wynn Las Vegas 12,830 FTE
CITY-NEAR Venetian Casino Resort, LLC 8,538 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Nevada, Las Vegas 8,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bellagio llc 6,383 FTE
NAT-TCR ProTrition Jackson Feed mill 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Marathon Courtyard 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 8424 Kao 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Detex 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Redner's Warehouse Market Dover 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE SFC System Facility Center 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midwest Dairy Transport LLC 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unitex South Windsor 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.