Site Preparation contractors · California

LASAR Underground construction

Fresno, CA · ~46 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

LASAR Underground construction runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Site Preparation contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

LASAR Underground construction: 2.4 TCR = 85% of Site Preparation contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

LASAR Underground construction safety composite

LASAR Underground construction scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

LASAR Underground construction held a steady TCR band

LASAR Underground construction's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=8.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238910 · Fresno, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 85% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #77/184
  • PHOTO James W. Flett Co., …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: James W. Flett Co., Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

LASAR Underground construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows LASAR Underground construction averages 2.4 TCR (85% of the Site Preparation contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

LASAR Underground construction TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=8.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where LASAR Underground construction falls in its industry

1,750 Site Preparation contractors establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #77 safest of 184 Site Preparation contractors employers in California.

LASAR Underground construction (46 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate LASAR Underground construction
LASAR Underground construction (46 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5

LASAR Underground construction has fewer employees than the Site Preparation contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 8.3 5.6 6 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 1 1 0
2020 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2019 4.4 3.0 2 1 0
2018 4.5 2.2 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238910 · CA · Fresno

1,750 Site Preparation contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 981 employers in Fresno, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR James W. Flett Co., Inc 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR RES Twin Cities 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CK Contractors & Development Florida 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Semmel Excavating LLC. 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Matteoli Brothers 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE IMR Farms-San Miguel 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE G&G Berry Farms 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pitigliano Farm Services, Inc. 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Fresno 7,553 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ag Force LLC 6,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Ctr 5,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Center 4,921 FTE
NAT-TCR David Clark Company Incorporated 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Derse Dallas 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Colfax 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Arizona Beverages USA, LLC 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Church Hill 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tlc Pipeline Construction 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kent City 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA Pensacola 22 Service Center Rd 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.